Official Tags Thread
This thread is for discussing questions and concerns regarding tags used by HypnoHub.

With the creation of our new Tag Creation Policy, this new thread was created to replace the old Official Tags Thread.
http://hypnohub.net/post?tags=premature_ejaculation

http://hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=premature_ejaculation

So, according to this, any hands-free orgasm is premature ejaculation. I don't see that working with this site, considering hypnotic orgasms are extremely common, and often occur with no physical stimulus.

Also, you forgot to mention in the tag creation policy that new tags should only be for subjects that aren't adequately covered by other tags or tag combinations.

Also, the new tag creation policy is terrible.
Mindwipe said:
http://hypnohub.net/post?tags=premature_ejaculation

http://hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=premature_ejaculation

So, according to this, any hands-free orgasm is premature ejaculation. I don't see that working with this site, considering hypnotic orgasms are extremely common, and often occur with no physical stimulus.
Yeah, pretty much. How about we use hands_free_orgasm instead? That should adequately cover those images, and doesn't actually seem to be something tagged here yet unless I'm missing it.
I've removed a few posts under "human furniture" that I found to not be related to transforming people into inanimate objects, be it metaphorically (like someone sitting on somebody on all fours) or literally (like that Tracer vacuum nightmare fuel post). A few of those posts involved a girl getting fucked as she's sitting on a guy's lap, while he's sitting on a chair of his own. That doesn't count, right...?

EDIT: I've also removed a few involving girls acting as mannequins; I suppose that might count to a certain extent, if so, I'll have to go back and revert the ones I removed. I just felt would make more sense for the tag if they were actually like modeling clothes, or holding it like a coat rack... [shrug]
http://hypnohub.net/post/show/41421
http://hypnohub.net/post/show/36230
Mindwipe said:
http://hypnohub.net/post?tags=premature_ejaculation

http://hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=premature_ejaculation

So, according to this, any hands-free orgasm is premature ejaculation. I don't see that working with this site, considering hypnotic orgasms are extremely common, and often occur with no physical stimulus.
Slightly updated definition to fix that.

Mindwipe said:
Also, you forgot to mention in the tag creation policy that new tags should only be for subjects that aren't adequately covered by other tags or tag combinations.
Slight update for this, too.

Mindwipe said:
Also, the new tag creation policy is terrible.
To be honest, we've already been letting users do more or less this for a number of months. All I did was make it official and write it down. I doubt many cons will come of it.

...But I've been surprised before. I guess we'll see.

RedCollarBlackCollar said:
A few of those posts involved a girl getting fucked as she's sitting on a guy's lap, while he's sitting on a chair of his own. That doesn't count, right...?
That doesn't count, you're correct. I mean, that's hardly using either character as furniture more than any other sex position that involves sitting or straddling.
Should the tag "hypnotic_massage" be created ?

There are images where we see a massage but it is not the cause of the hypnosis (http://hypnohub.net/post/show/30668/absurdres-bikini-black_hair-black_lipstick-blonde_)
And others where the massage is directly the cause (http://hypnohub.net/post/show/37467/blonde_hair-blue_eyes-bottomless-cleavage-closed_e) .

It's the same principle of "kissing" and "hypnotic_kiss", or "dancing" and "hypnotic_dance" .
Since massage is a very powerful technique ...
DaisyHypnoCharm said:
Should the tag "hypnotic_massage" be created ?
We very well could create the tag. Your logic is sound.
So, I saw that a sexuality_change tag has been created as per my suggestion on that shit storm pic, and I took the liberty of defining it based on what I believe was the main criteria that was brought up. However, I see that most of the pics currently using the tag don't seem to fit that definition. Am I just missing something? Should the definition be something else? Help me out here, guys.
Just remove any that don't seem to explicitly state a character not being into guys/chicks (couple examples I could think of) and then being changed to not think that anymore.

EDIT: I've removed the ones I felt didn't really belong. If there is reason for the tag to apply, I'd like to hear why; not that I'm the only one who must approve, I'd just like to know is all. Some of em do seem a bit random without context given as for why they were chosen.
spoiler
Okay, so who the fuck approved changing the "hypno" tag to "there_is_no_point_to_a_'hypno'_tag_on_hypnohub"? There is a point when it's the name of the fucking character, dipshit.

Edit: OH EVEN BETTER! It's broken! Now no one can search for "hypno" or the ridiculous tag it was replaced with. It just returns blank results. Good fucking job, whoever you are. gg. play of the game.
Alright, I fixed that massive fuck up, I think. The stupid aliases for hypno and hypnosis are gone and hypno_(pokemon) is back to being just hypno. That tag has been fine for years. There's no need to add the pokemon append to it now.
Mindwipe said:
Okay, so who the fuck approved changing the "hypno" tag to "there_is_no_point_to_a_'hypno'_tag_on_hypnohub"? There is a point when it's the name of the fucking character, dipshit.

Edit: OH EVEN BETTER! It's broken! Now no one can search for "hypno" or the ridiculous tag it was replaced with. It just returns blank results. Good fucking job, whoever you are. gg. play of the game.
This happened? XD

That's ridiculous. Amusing, but ridiculous. Thanks for your hard work on fixing that.
Also, sorry for how ragey those posts were. I was already pretty irritated by other stuff, and then I ran into that problem while trying to tag 8 uploads and that sent me over the edge. I'm good now.
Drugs, drugged, drug, hypnotic drugs... What should we keep/remove?
RedCollarBlackCollar said:
Drugs, drugged, drug, hypnotic drugs... What should we keep/remove?
To me, drugs should only be there if you can see real-word materials related to drug use (i.e. needles not potions).(Though I'm shaky on this as for how many posts it could apply to) Drug is redundant for drugs. Drugged is useful because some people do enjoy a person who is visible impaired by chemicals, but it would have to be obvious it had to do with drugs and not plain old hypnosis. And something just feels off about "hypnotic drugs" to me but I can't put it into words exactly.
RedCollarBlackCollar said:
Drugs, drugged, drug, hypnotic drugs... What should we keep/remove?
"drug" is ungrammatical in most instances imo. Toss it.

"drugs" is more grammatical. Alias the former to the latter, and make sure they're both being used correctly i.e. someone should probably edit the wiki to give a more exact definition.

"drugged" feels like it's redundant. I don't think there are many cases where drugs are in the image and they're *not* being used.

"hypnotic drugs" has a different meaning, keep it. Maybe consider adding a tag parent of "drugs" to it, as well.

kirux said:
And something just feels off about "hypnotic drugs" to me but I can't put it into words exactly.
I kinda get what you mean, but the term has a very specific use case here that seems appropriate. Not all drugs are 'hypnotic'. If you can think of a better term for "drugs used for mind control" feel free to suggest it.
plsignore said:
"drugged" feels like it's redundant. I don't think there are many cases where drugs are in the image and they're *not* being used.
Sometimes there are no drugs in the picture but it's implied that they were/are drugged though.

Edit: Let me state it another way, if I was in the mood to look at some porn of someone that was drugged and hypnotized, the person being "drugged" in this case, either by medical drugs, illicit, or even potions, has more visual impact and easier to tag. While there may not be drugs in the picture of a manip per say, it can still be stated that the person in question is high/whatever, without drugs being in the picture. I think drugged is the most important visual and obvious for searching purposes.

Also drugged is a tag on gelbooru as well.
Originally posted in the vent room but I'll retype it here.

kirux said:
I've always wondered why on earth we have a nightmare_fuel tag. It's not on other booru's, the definition feels like a violation of the subjective rule ("tag for posts that are dark and twisted.") and feels redundant when we have a blacklist system. While I know we are working on the comments with the new moderation positions (thank you Henry) this just seems like a problem to me when you have a tag like that. And now it's caused Firemario and other's trouble in such a severe way as a tasteless nonconstructive insult almost. Perhaps update the definition to be less subjective to solve at least that one problem and the comment mods can fix useless comments but still, it doesn't sit right.
ErrantRealityA said:
I generally agree with this sentiment. Even having looked through the pictures tagged with nightmare_fuel, it doesn't really seem there is a clear, objective definition of nightmare_fuel. (Which is why I personally don't use it.) I've seen a lot of people use the tag on things they find creepy, and then the tag later gets removed.

If I had to provide a solution to replace the tag, here's what I'd do:
- Remove the tag
- Add a creepy_face tag (would apply to deformed, distorted, or lifeless faces and would cover 75% or more of the nightmare_fuel images)
- Use the parasite tag more liberally (any time someone has some foreign life form coming out of their mouth or genitals)
- Use the insect tag more consistently, where appropriate
- Use the brain_injection tag where appropriate
- Add tags for brain eating and possibly something dealing with implied or imminent death.

The problem seems to be that the nightmare_fuel tag is being used to cover all of these different situations, so it's not really clear what it's purpose is.
kirux said:
I feel like you wouldn't need to do creepy_face(still feels subjective) as much as distorted_anatomy(vs exaggerated_anatomy when someone has ahegao, or unreasonably large breats but not in a terrifying way). This would also cover body parts that are arranged in such a way to be disturbing including face, though you could have both I suppose.

As for brain-eating, I mostly see the nightmare_fuel in that case added to pictures that have pseudo zombie like qualities. (The ones where mushrooms are growing out of obviously deceased if not soon to be deceased people). And just be more liberal with a zombie tag or something similar for those implied to be killed during the hypnosis process.
Sorry if this isn't the appropriate way to present it here but I was asked to move it out of the vent room thread.
Can we get a clarification on when something is 'sexuality change'

Because there's mutliple instances of things being removed and added when there is obvious changes in established characters 'sexuality' and in the manip and when there isn't.

i.e.

most of wonder woman's yuri stuff. I.e.

http://hypnohub.net/post/show/29744/barefoot-black_hair-bottomless-corruption-costume-

http://hypnohub.net/post/show/42229/black_hair-bondage-bottomless-cheetah-dc_comics-fe

and "hinata wants to be not shy.....ends with her wanting to be ino's 'personal sex slave'"

http://hypnohub.net/post/show/37929/barefoot-blonde_hair-bottomless-comic-earrings-fem

and less sexuality change and more just....standard bimbofication

http://hypnohub.net/post/show/44823/before_and_after-bimbofication-boots-brown_hair-cl
JB-007 said:
and less sexuality change and more just....standard bimbofication

http://hypnohub.net/post/show/44823/before_and_after-bimbofication-boots-brown_hair-cl
But it's not just "standard bimbofication."

It's part of an image pool where that character explicitly had her sexuality changed.
http://hypnohub.net/post/show/43389
JB-007 said:
Can we get a clarification on when something is 'sexuality change'

Because there's mutliple instances of things being removed and added when there is obvious changes in established characters 'sexuality' and in the manip and when there isn't.
As far as the Mindwipe said in the vent room thread. It doesn't apply to transgender pics (like bimboification transgender pics where a guy is turned into a girl who has sex with guys) nor does it matter what the canon sexuality of the character is. It has to be explicitly stated that the character has one sexuality at the start and has it changed.

i.e. We do not care if canonically Hinata from Naruto is straight and there's a manip that has her as a lesbian. It has to have her turning straight to lesbian or vice versa in the manip/art.
Created a "webpage_layout" tag for some of those Lyoko pics I helped put together. Wondering if there's any ideas for a better name, and whether or not stuff outside of just webpages (such as Skype <____< or like Facebook could apply).
Created a "monochrome_(color_scheme)" tag for images that follow a black-and-white color scheme. Or do we have a tag for that?
NinjaW said:
Created a "monochrome_(color_scheme)" tag for images that follow a black-and-white color scheme. Or do we have a tag for that?
"greyscale"
Birthday tag added, as we have ones for specific holidays.
I think this can work nicely for any pics that actually celebrate birthdays as the actual content, and not just pics that one user makes for another.