New idea, crowdcommission.
Hello everyone.
Recently, I have been willing to order some commissions for the hub to enjoy.
However, commissions need funds, but for some of the biggest ideas I have in mind, it might become hard for a single person to pay for everything, be it because of animation, number of characters, elements involved or anything else.

However, I was wondering if perhaps some interested member of the hub community would be interested in pooling together some ressources in order to turn these ideas into reality, giving the hub some quality content for everyone to enjoy.

I would be glad to initiate or participate on such a project and I hope many will be interested.
This is an idea that I an support...morally anyways I don't have spare cash most of the time but considering how well known Whisper is I feel that this is a safe thing to go in on.
I don't think my illustrations would really be what you guys would be looking for, but I suppose I could always help with stuff involving design, concept work, helping flesh out the story/content, etc.
I support it though where the cash is gonna go will need to be discussed.
RedCollarBlackCollar said:
I don't think my illustrations would really be what you guys would be looking for, but I suppose I could always help with stuff involving design, concept work, helping flesh out the story/content, etc.
Same here, I offer my support doing my stuff and not asking for anything on return
Count me in
Of course I am planning to tell you what I plan to comission myself.
I had an idea to commission a piece to sebastian to celebrate the ghost in the shell movie.
A piece inspired by sleepymaid's hypnotic tv gif. Where both the classic and normal versions are being plugged to a central computer, with words flashing, altering their bodies and mind. Their expressions shifting with each words. I would also like to make a futa version.
Whisper said:
celebrate
Whisper said:
ghost in the shell movie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ji9qSuQapFY
If nothing else I am glad they did a ghost in the shell movie.
Sure it might suck (I haven't seen it yet) but it shows that people are willing to invest into things I like.
And scarlet johanson drawn by Sebastian in the cyborg skin is sure to look gorgeous~
Whisper said:
If nothing else I am glad they did a ghost in the shell movie.
Sure it might suck (I haven't seen it yet) but it shows that people are willing to invest into things I like.
And scarlet johanson drawn by Sebastian in the cyborg skin is sure to look gorgeous~
they invested in dragonball evolution too
Someone I'm subscribed to on FurAffinity has a Patreon campaign set up just to help fund the commissions he gets and puts up in his gallery. Perhaps you could try something like that?
The hub would be the gallery, and that would be all.
Pinkanator said:
they invested in dragonball evolution too
It was not meant to be good.
Never advertised.
Made to sucker fan money.
Which is not the vibe I got from GitS so far.
So far...
Whisper said:
The hub would be the gallery, and that would be all.It was not meant to be good.
Never advertised.
Made to sucker fan money.
Which is not the vibe I got from GitS so far.
So far...
The American Live action Fist of the Northstar movie.
Whisper said:
The hub would be the gallery, and that would be all.It was not meant to be good.
Never advertised.
Made to sucker fan money.
Which is not the vibe I got from GitS so far.
So far...
yeah gits seems more desperate

like

really desperate

like

lone ranger desperate
Pinkanator said:
yeah gits seems more desperate

like

really desperate

like

lone ranger desperate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
Pinkanator said:
yeah gits seems more desperate

like

really desperate

like

lone ranger desperate
*Insert obligatory reference to the new Power Rangers movie.*
i've gotten crowd comms before from kaaroleplayx, that's how the kaa erika and naomi comic got made!
It sounds like a good idea.

However, I wonder how the feedback process would look like.

The more funders, the more contradictory feedback the artist gets. Give all the funders a voice and the process goes nowhere.

A way to tackle that is the group of funders choose one of them as the only privileged to give feedback and write decisions in stone. Another way is that only funders funding a certain % or more have the privilege to feedback.
MaDrow said:
It sounds like a good idea.

However, I wonder how the feedback process would look like.

The more funders, the more contradictory feedback the artist gets. Give all the funders a voice and the process goes nowhere.

A way to tackle that is the group of funders choose one of them as the only privileged to give feedback and write decisions in stone. Another way is that only funders funding a certain % or more have the privilege to feedback.
OF course, project leadership would befall on the biggest pledgers!
But usually funders would gather behind a project they relate to in the first place!