A preview of the next part in the League of Lovers pool, and my first attempt at editing an image. I'd never edited a picture this much before and I think it turned out pretty good.
Not sure if I should tag as loli - she does have the child-like appearance, lack of curvature and zero chest, at least that's what it looks like to me. However, I'm going to hold off until further judgement considering the shitshow that happened last time I tagged something as loli.
For obvious reasons, if it applies to this picture it would also apply to the version with text.
NamesAreForTheWeak said: Not sure if I should tag as loli - she does have the child-like appearance, lack of curvature and zero chest, at least that's what it looks like to me. However, I'm going to hold off until further judgement considering the shitshow that happened last time I tagged something as loli.
For obvious reasons, if it applies to this picture it would also apply to the version with text.
Nope! None of the Yordles are lolis. All of them would at least be considered adults in human age, and definitely adults in... I dunno... Yordle years?
Hypnokarp said: Nope! None of the Yordles are lolis. All of them would at least be considered adults in human age, and definitely adults in... I dunno... Yordle years?
Hypnokarp said: Nope! None of the Yordles are lolis. All of them would at least be considered adults in human age, and definitely adults in... I dunno... Yordle years?
Just saying, the image looks like a little girl to me. Canon age doesn't matter for the tag - if it's 3000 years old but looks like a loli, it's a loli as far as tagging is concerned.
Still holding off, I've been wrong before. Would really like mod input.
NamesAreForTheWeak said: Just saying, the image looks like a little girl to me. Canon age doesn't matter for the tag - if it's 3000 years old but looks like a loli, it's a loli as far as tagging is concerned.
Still holding off, I've been wrong before. Would really like mod input.
Mod input has arrived @_@
As for this image, I did add the loli tag because it's really kinda hard to pin it down since it's pretty stylized, but I took a better-safe-than-sorry approach. Nothing against the image, but as NAFTW said, our 'loli' tag is for images that show a prepubescent body, regardless of their canon age. This is a definition given to us by the site owner (Slayerduck), and you can read the exact definition in our <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=loli|loli tag def page.>>
>> #70456
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #70476
Score: 0 (vote Up)
However, I'm going to hold off until further judgement considering the shitshow that happened last time I tagged something as loli.
For obvious reasons, if it applies to this picture it would also apply to the version with text.
>> #70477
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #70497
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Not sure if I should tag as loli - she does have the child-like appearance, lack of curvature and zero chest, at least that's what it looks like to me.
However, I'm going to hold off until further judgement considering the shitshow that happened last time I tagged something as loli.
For obvious reasons, if it applies to this picture it would also apply to the version with text.
Nope! None of the Yordles are lolis. All of them would at least be considered adults in human age, and definitely adults in... I dunno... Yordle years?
>> #70498
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Nope! None of the Yordles are lolis. All of them would at least be considered adults in human age, and definitely adults in... I dunno... Yordle years?
Nope! None of the Yordles are lolis. All of them would at least be considered adults in human age, and definitely adults in... I dunno... Yordle years?
Just saying, the image looks like a little girl to me. Canon age doesn't matter for the tag - if it's 3000 years old but looks like a loli, it's a loli as far as tagging is concerned.
Still holding off, I've been wrong before. Would really like mod input.
>> #70502
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Just saying, the image looks like a little girl to me. Canon age doesn't matter for the tag - if it's 3000 years old but looks like a loli, it's a loli as far as tagging is concerned.
Still holding off, I've been wrong before. Would really like mod input.
Mod input has arrived @_@
As for this image, I did add the loli tag because it's really kinda hard to pin it down since it's pretty stylized, but I took a better-safe-than-sorry approach. Nothing against the image, but as NAFTW said, our 'loli' tag is for images that show a prepubescent body, regardless of their canon age. This is a definition given to us by the site owner (Slayerduck), and you can read the exact definition in our <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=loli|loli tag def page.>>