This post was deleted. Reason: QCC Decision. MD5: 35b5003924b8083e4e8fc7d6b7f9db3c

Edit | Respond

Your animation seems to be a little broken.
Please when uploading have proper source + add "tagme" when unsure of what else to put.
Am I wrong, or does the bottom head looks straight out of a sleepymaid pic?
BoredAsAnything said:
Am I wrong, or does the bottom head looks straight out of a sleepymaid pic?
Oh boy, last thing we need is some good ol' plagiarism.....
BoredAsAnything said:
Am I wrong, or does the bottom head looks straight out of a sleepymaid pic?
The head and lights appear to be from post #82
Mindwipe said:
The head and lights appear to be from post #82
Oh it is definitely the same head/lights. There's no mistaking it.
Fucking A, another plagirism post. I feel like a news post is in order to explain to the influx of new members that we don't stand for this shit =____=
SomeCallMeSalty said:
Oh it is definitely the same head/lights. There's no mistaking it.
RedCollarBlackCollar said:
Fucking A, another plagirism post. I feel like a news post is in order to explain to the influx of new members that we don't stand for this shit =____=
Agreed.
I'm going to send this one over to the QCC for the weird brown lines that show up for a couple frames, as well as perspective issues.

You can read more about the process here.
Dreamshade said:
I'm going to send this one over to the QCC for the weird brown lines that show up for a couple frames, as well as perspective issues.

You can read more about the process here.
The brown lines are to illustrate motion. That or they're artifacts from some animation software. Anyway, this is getting deleted so it doesn't matter.
I think the background, the camera and the Russian doll are also taken from some other places; they look out of place, like the guy forgot to add the . The ball also looks out of place(who the FUCK, would need to plagiarist a circle?) A more important question is, if the animation was his own handiwork, it's quite good. Why would he need to steal a still shot of a face from some place else, and jeopardise any good opinions anyone would have had of him?
Here's a question. Is this plagiarism, or a very detailed manip using props from many sources? It's such a fine line. I mean, you can already argue that manips are plagiarism and have a pretty solid ground to stand on.

I'm not quite sure what to think about this one, here.

It would be clear if the artist were trying to claim it is his/her original work, but as far as I can see, they're not. And I don't have and can't find a source to see if that's the case somewhere else or not.

To me, it just seems like one HELL of a manip.

With all that in mind, I'm curious what you guys might think on this.
Vanndril said:
Here's a question. Is this plagiarism, or a very detailed manip using props from many sources? It's such a fine line. I mean, you can already argue that manips are plagiarism and have a pretty solid ground to stand on.

I'm not quite sure what to think about this one, here.

It would be clear if the artist were trying to claim it is his/her original work, but as far as I can see, they're not. And I don't have and can't find a source to see if that's the case somewhere else or not.

To me, it just seems like one HELL of a manip.

With all that in mind, I'm curious what you guys might think on this.
Plagiarism (here at least) I'd argue comes to the point where u take somebody else's work and claim it as your own, without any acknowledgment to the original source or simply that it's not at all your work.
And I only say that in regards to when that other post came up around the same day where the entire image was drawn over somebody else's artwork of Nidalee from LoL, as a number of us (or I at least) thought that it was original (given how it was even tagged as such). Im still kinda salty about it being left up, but I understand the reasoning. Regardless, that's kinda where I draw the line, cause with most manips they're at least tagged as that, the manniper's tagged, and/or it's super obvious. When drawn over tho where it looks like original art is where it seems to be most concerning...