Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? nintendo 21608
- ? pokemon 13771
Character
- ? alolan vulpix 18
- ? pokemon (creature) 2323
- ? vulpix 42
Artist
- ? poketizer (manipper) 21
General
- ? animals only 1490
- ? femdom 30029
- ? femsub 131548
- ? furry 17811
- ? hair ribbon 1399
- ? hypnotized hypnotist 3697
- ? looking at viewer 12548
- ? pink eyes 8184
- ? pov 8578
- ? pov sub 5003
- ? ribbon 3053
Meta
- ? caption 8905
- ? manip 16626
- ? text 82074
Statistics
- Id: 43411
-
Posted: 2016-12-29 16:07:12
by Poketizer - Size: 1700x1000
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...ium&illust_id=5821301
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 46 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #146951
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146955
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146956
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ALERT! ALERT! CUTENESS OVERLOAD! TOO MUCH CUTE TO COMPREHEND! *melts*
*takes note of that*
>> #146957
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146961
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146972
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ALERT! ALERT! CUTENESS OVERLOAD! TOO MUCH CUTE TO COMPREHEND! *melts*
So adorable I just want to squeeze and pet it @.@
>> #146979
Score: 0 (vote Up)
FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME, TAG YOUR WEIRD FURSHIT
THANKS
Wouldn't that only apply if Vulpi was anthro? I quote from the 'furry' tag page:
"Characters that are almost entirely animal in nature - ones that don't have a particularly human body shape, don't have human hands, etc. - do not receive this tag."
While the animals_only tag applies here, the furry tag doesn't.
>> #146980
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146985
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Hey, WhatIsLove, we had a guy here before who used to post the exact same thing on furry pics. He's banned for 2000 years. So try to cool it, okay?
Ya don't think... Nah, couldn't be......
>> #147157
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Ya don't think... Nah, couldn't be......
Did you guys make sure it twas an IP ban, out of curiousity?