Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? original 42220
Character
- ? nadia (iahfy) 1
Artist
- ? iahfy 8
- ? theheckle (manipper) 150
General
- ? all fours 3501
- ? bottomless 40385
- ? breasts 101755
- ? collar 13421
- ? lobotomy 315
- ? nude 37471
- ? pet play 4691
- ? stitches 73
- ? tongue 18727
- ? tongue out 18004
- ? topless 43938
Meta
- ? caption 8848
- ? manip 16523
- ? text 79920
Statistics
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #220878
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I was just beginning to like Dr. Silling from the last one, where we saw some of Dr. Duclos's experimentation. Now Duclos is gone and Silling is doing the reporting, and I'm back to hating him.
>> #220879
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I was just beginning to like Dr. Silling from the last one, where we saw some of Dr. Duclos's experimentation. Now Duclos is gone and Silling is doing the reporting, and I'm back to hating him.
Most characters in this series who do experiments and such are going to be remorseless about it. They truly believe what they're doing is good
>> #220889
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Most characters in this series who do experiments and such are going to be remorseless about it. They truly believe what they're doing is good
Yeah, figured that out after pics 2 and 3. It's just that vileness and lunacy are overshadowed by even greater lunacy and vileness. It's like how when I compare Adolf Hitler and Hermann Goering (Goering being one of the most highest ranking officials of Nazi Germany, though significantly less of a Nazi than other members), I draw the conclusion that the latter isn't that bad of a guy.
And then I look at him compared to someone who isn't quite as vile as Hitler and suddenly he looks quite a bit worse. That's how I was with Duclos and Silling (though perhaps Himmler vs Goering would be a more apt comparison considering the role of Duclos as a heartless quack)
>> #220902
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #220904
Score: 0 (vote Up)
The fact that you, again, edited out an artist's watermark on their pic is really rubbing me the wrong way.
I don't do it to discredit the original artist. It just feels like leaving it there kind of breaks the illusion.
>> #220905
Score: 1 (vote Up)
>> #220906
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #273820
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #273824
Score: 0 (vote Up)
So who was the artist, then?
iahfy.
Manippers should always tag the original artists and include source links. While Ik this is 8 months late, it's also discouraged to go removing signatures.
>> #274774
Score: 0 (vote Up)
iahfy.
Manippers should always tag the original artists and include source links. While Ik this is 8 months late, it's also discouraged to go removing signatures.
Ah, okay, thank you- sorry, I am new to this site! Still figuring everything out. It is a real pleasure to be here though, heh.