beach bikini black_hair blush breasts cleavage collarbone expressionless female_only femdom femsub hair_ribbon happy_trance hyperdimension_neptunia hypnotic_drug large_breasts long_hair lying manip noire open_mouth red_eyes ribbon rize_(manipper) spiral_eyes swimsuit symbol_in_eyes text twintails water yuri

Edit | Respond

I've noticed this with some of your past manips as well:
Please remember to tag the original artists, and include a source link.
I'm pretty sure "Massive text wall" isn't a legit reason to delete anything.
Rize said:
I'm pretty sure "Massive text wall" isn't a legit reason to delete anything.
Rules have been updated for text manips

Text manips with little relation to what is portrayed in the image or has excessive grammar and spelling errors
Imasuky said:
Rules have been updated for text manips

Text manips with little relation to what is portrayed in the image or has excessive grammar and spelling errors
Yeah, but I can see "Reason: Massive text wall". That doesn't sound like a issue.
If you are really deleting manips to fit new rules, then at least tell people exacly what's the issue.
I didn't saw this post, so I'm not sure if the story was so massive and complex that it didn't go with the image or if there were some grammar/spelling errors.
And I think manipper doesn't know that too.
This is the post: https://i.imgur.com/kO10L1I.jpg
(The original looked better, imgur put a bunch of artifacts on it)
And while the story is a bit longer than my usual, it's not that long, especially compared to other manips from other users, that are still here.
Rize said:
This is the post: https://i.imgur.com/kO10L1I.jpg
(The original looked better, imgur put a bunch of artifacts on it)
And while the story is a bit longer than my usual, it's not that long, especially compared to other manips from other users, that are still here.
This is great, why the hell was that deleted?
PolishGuy said:
This is great, why the hell was that deleted?
Are you kidding?
look at the crude manip job on the eyes also the size of the text compared to image and also the background.
Argonis said:
Are you kidding?
look at the crude manip job on the eyes also the size of the text compared to image and also the background.
Are YOU kidding?
The reason for deleting this is "massive text wall", how is that even related to the eyes on the picture?
Actually, what's wrong with her eyes? They look fine to me, what rules are they breaking?
Size of the text and background are also okay, because you can read all of this withouth any problems.
It really looks like a mod just said "nah, fuck it, I don't like it"
Argonis said:
Are you kidding?
look at the crude manip job on the eyes also the size of the text compared to image and also the background.
What? I've used those eyes in at least 6 manips before, the effect isn't that easy to do, I bet you can't replicate it, and the original eyes were slowly deleted to a pixel level precision, I even kept the original hair transparencies over the eyes, the text looks perfectly fine without jpeg artifacts that imgur adds once you see the image in full size, it's size 24 in photoshop, that isn't small. The background is just a color to contrast the dialogue, if it's too bright that can be easily changed, but nobody said anything while the image was still here, so that didn't look like a reason for deletion either.
If we're taking down images for massive text walls now, does that mean we have to go back and take down some older manips like the ones grima180 and hwd171 have made? Because some of their captions are essay length and far longer than stuff like Rize and I have put out.
waluigithewalrus said:
If we're taking down images for massive text walls now, does that mean we have to go back and take down some older manips like the ones grima180 and hwd171 have made? Because some of their captions are essay length and far longer than stuff like Rize and I have put out.
There are almost 50 pages worth of caption manips so it'll take some time but all of them are coming under review
Imasuky said:
There are almost 50 pages worth of caption manips so it'll take some time but all of them are coming under review
Which makes the entire situation even more ridiculous.
With some manips you are unable to give a solid reason to take them under review.
What's the reason, what criteria are you using?
"Wall of text" isn't breaking any rules and that's just one example.
Instead of letting community decide what they want to see, you are "reviewing" manips based on some subjective criterias.
It doesn't work and you are just making people angry
3 hours and still no reason (aside from "moderators thinks it's bad") to delete this or any other manips.
PolishGuy said:
3 hours and still no reason (aside from "moderators thinks it's bad") to delete this or any other manips.
If i'm being honest, I also think this somewhat nonsensical and draconian "ripping down of anything at any time for petty reasons" is a problem on this site and has been for a while, imo.
KarmaX said:
If i'm being honest, I also think this somewhat nonsensical and draconian "ripping down of anything at any time for petty reasons" is a problem on this site and has been for a while, imo.
Maybe it was a problem before but now it is just a nonsense.
Sometimes the official reason doesn't adds up with an explanation given by mods...and that's if they are even giving any!
It really looks like "we know better than the rest of community" type of situation