Transmansub/dom and Transwomansub/dom. Simple.
eldomtom2 said:
Transmansub/dom and Transwomansub/dom. Simple.
Transmansub/dom and Transwomansub/dom. Simple.
We're not doing that. Wouldn't work for the site.
If anything, we have an idea to possibly remedy the issue. Nothing official yet though.
I have a suggestion for two new tags, but before just adding them I wanted to make sure they weren't sufficiently covered by already existing tags. The tags in mind being 'mommy' and 'daddy'. I'm aware there are already tags such as 'incest' 'mother_and_son/daughter' etc, but nothing explicitly calling out the title of 'mommy' or 'daddy'.
There are posts such as hypnohub.net/post/show/46...grey_skin-huge_ass-huge_b (warning: shota/loli) that shows the dom telling the subs to call her 'mommy'. It does feature incest, but only because the subs are brother and sister.
I am worried it might fall along the same lines as calling the dom master/mistress, but as the mommy/daddy title is a common fetish I feel that it would belong on the site.
There are posts such as hypnohub.net/post/show/46...grey_skin-huge_ass-huge_b (warning: shota/loli) that shows the dom telling the subs to call her 'mommy'. It does feature incest, but only because the subs are brother and sister.
I am worried it might fall along the same lines as calling the dom master/mistress, but as the mommy/daddy title is a common fetish I feel that it would belong on the site.
crimsonthekiller said:
I have a suggestion for two new tags, but before just adding them I wanted to make sure they weren't sufficiently covered by already existing tags. The tags in mind being 'mommy' and 'daddy'. I'm aware there are already tags such as 'incest' 'mother_and_son/daughter' etc, but nothing explicitly calling out the title of 'mommy' or 'daddy'.
There are posts such as hypnohub.net/post/show/46...grey_skin-huge_ass-huge_b (warning: shota/loli) that shows the dom telling the subs to call her 'mommy'. It does feature incest, but only because the subs are brother and sister.
I am worried it might fall along the same lines as calling the dom master/mistress, but as the mommy/daddy title is a common fetish I feel that it would belong on the site.
I have a suggestion for two new tags, but before just adding them I wanted to make sure they weren't sufficiently covered by already existing tags. The tags in mind being 'mommy' and 'daddy'. I'm aware there are already tags such as 'incest' 'mother_and_son/daughter' etc, but nothing explicitly calling out the title of 'mommy' or 'daddy'.
There are posts such as hypnohub.net/post/show/46...grey_skin-huge_ass-huge_b (warning: shota/loli) that shows the dom telling the subs to call her 'mommy'. It does feature incest, but only because the subs are brother and sister.
I am worried it might fall along the same lines as calling the dom master/mistress, but as the mommy/daddy title is a common fetish I feel that it would belong on the site.
I think tags used for words spoken in dialogue is a pretty bad idea. Seems more like a pool thing if anything.
I have a suggestion for a new tag for those that post images solely for the introduction of characters that have said character as well as a bio, i suggest a profile tag similar to the character_sheet tag for artists there could be a tag called profile or character_profile in the same wording character_sheet.It could make it easier to fine these particular posts.
RedCollarBlackCollar said:
We're not doing that. Wouldn't work for the site.
If anything, we have an idea to possibly remedy the issue. Nothing official yet though.
We're not doing that. Wouldn't work for the site.
If anything, we have an idea to possibly remedy the issue. Nothing official yet though.
Has any progress on this been made? I'm not exactly happy about seeing vaginas in male_only images.
This looks like the right place for this. I'd like to request a lip_expansion tag. There's a breast_expansion tag already, and an ass_expansion as well so this seems like it should fit with it.
eldomtom2 said:
Has any progress on this been made? I'm not exactly happy about seeing vaginas in male_only images.
Has any progress on this been made? I'm not exactly happy about seeing vaginas in male_only images.
Sry for late response. As far as ik, not much progress has come about, though I'm hoping to have us implement something eventually... Idk overall though.
I made some changes about the Cleopatra's tag.
Since there are several interpretations of her, historical, fictional, and the one I use, with a pointy nose, comes from the <<www.bedetheque.com/media/Planches/PlancheA_180525.jpg|Asterix series>>,
I simply named the tag : cleopatra (asterix) .
Also added the asterix (series) tag.
Since there are several interpretations of her, historical, fictional, and the one I use, with a pointy nose, comes from the <<www.bedetheque.com/media/Planches/PlancheA_180525.jpg|Asterix series>>,
I simply named the tag : cleopatra (asterix) .
Also added the asterix (series) tag.
Symbiote tag needs to be reviewed + fixed.
hypnohub.net/post?tags=symbiote
hypnohub.net/post?tags=symbiote
So I want to understand the philosophy of the loli tag, because one of my favorites was marked with this, which puts it on the auto-blacklist.
Now, in this image, there is nothing explicit. They are nude, but all the naughty bits are obscured with water. It seems to me it just so happens to show a flat chested girl.
Is that what #loli is for? To keep people from seeing pettanko without a warning?
Now, in this image, there is nothing explicit. They are nude, but all the naughty bits are obscured with water. It seems to me it just so happens to show a flat chested girl.
Is that what #loli is for? To keep people from seeing pettanko without a warning?
Lloyd said:
So I want to understand the philosophy of the loli tag, because one of my favorites was marked with this, which puts it on the auto-blacklist.
Now, in this image, there is nothing explicit. They are nude, but all the naughty bits are obscured with water. It seems to me it just so happens to show a flat chested girl.
Is that what #loli is for? To keep people from seeing pettanko without a warning?
So I want to understand the philosophy of the loli tag, because one of my favorites was marked with this, which puts it on the auto-blacklist.
Now, in this image, there is nothing explicit. They are nude, but all the naughty bits are obscured with water. It seems to me it just so happens to show a flat chested girl.
Is that what #loli is for? To keep people from seeing pettanko without a warning?
loli and shota are for any images with underage charterers regardless of if there is anything explicate in the image.
It's for safety reasons.
Imasuky said:
loli and shota are for any images with underage charterers regardless of if there is anything explicate in the image.
It's for safety reasons.
loli and shota are for any images with underage charterers regardless of if there is anything explicate in the image.
It's for safety reasons.
Not underage characters, characters that look prepubescent.
Mindwipe said:
Not underage characters, characters that look prepubescent.
Not underage characters, characters that look prepubescent.
right.
Imasuky said:
loli and shota are for any images with underage charterers regardless of if there is anything explicate in the image.
It's for safety reasons.
loli and shota are for any images with underage charterers regardless of if there is anything explicate in the image.
It's for safety reasons.
Mindwipe said:
Not underage characters, characters that look prepubescent.
Understood.
Blarb.
