krump said:
What are my options? Reupload?
What are my options? Reupload?
Yeah you can probably reupload that, it might get caught in the filter but if it does just change a single pixel by a single value.
Yeah you can probably reupload that, it might get caught in the filter but if it does just change a single pixel by a single value.
Howdy, SingleSalt here. About 2 years I asked to have my work placed on the Do Not post list after AI became permitted on the site. 2 years later, AI is everywhere and everything is worse. Running does not work.
I am asking for my name to be removed for me DNP list. under the current climate, I'd rather post my work everywhere than have it seen nowhere, regardless of AI.
if any mod could help me out that would be greatly appreciated, thank you in advance.
I am asking for my name to be removed for me DNP list. under the current climate, I'd rather post my work everywhere than have it seen nowhere, regardless of AI.
if any mod could help me out that would be greatly appreciated, thank you in advance.
SingleSalt said:
Howdy, SingleSalt here. About 2 years I asked to have my work placed on the Do Not post list after AI became permitted on the site. 2 years later, AI is everywhere and everything is worse. Running does not work.
I am asking for my name to be removed for me DNP list. under the current climate, I'd rather post my work everywhere than have it seen nowhere, regardless of AI.
if any mod could help me out that would be greatly appreciated, thank you in advance.
Howdy, SingleSalt here. About 2 years I asked to have my work placed on the Do Not post list after AI became permitted on the site. 2 years later, AI is everywhere and everything is worse. Running does not work.
I am asking for my name to be removed for me DNP list. under the current climate, I'd rather post my work everywhere than have it seen nowhere, regardless of AI.
if any mod could help me out that would be greatly appreciated, thank you in advance.
I'll remove you from the list, though re-uploads will have to be done manually as we have no way to restore those.
If you get caught in the duplicate filter, changing a single pixel by a single value in any channel will bypass it. Not much we can do about that either unfortunately.
Hoping for approval for these posts:
hypnohub.net/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=219619
hypnohub.net/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=219618
hypnohub.net/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=219619
hypnohub.net/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=219618
hypnohub.net/index.php?page=forum&s=view&id=106663
i believe FranTheFlan is saying they would like to be removed from the DNP list.
i believe FranTheFlan is saying they would like to be removed from the DNP list.
Heya Mods just wondering if I could get some of my posts approved lol
Is there a rule against actual hypno vids, like things intended to hypnotize? Because a bunch of them were uploaded.
I want to say the same, but also they would be tagged as seizure warning.
'
This post was deleted. Reason: Images aren't tagged as hypnosis on pixiv, no indication that they're sequels / MD5: 52e481c483fd8063665d6e9105592a02
'
I'm going to try and assume the mod responsible is not trying to pick a fight and just doing their job.
That in mind:
Pixiv has a ten tag limit, and they are partially community posted. "Pixiv didn't tag something" is like saying McfirstHHubUploader493 didn't tag something, and he is allowed a whole 4 of them so he sure got them all. It doesn't make any sense. They're not meant to be exhaustive in any way.
The images were posted back to back, of the same character, with the same hearts popping around her head and breathing heavily, the second image had heart eyes, and the third image had the same background and underwear as the second one
We are stretching the phrase 'no indication' here to the limit. Please chill out a little bit.
This post was deleted. Reason: Images aren't tagged as hypnosis on pixiv, no indication that they're sequels / MD5: 52e481c483fd8063665d6e9105592a02
'
I'm going to try and assume the mod responsible is not trying to pick a fight and just doing their job.
That in mind:
Pixiv has a ten tag limit, and they are partially community posted. "Pixiv didn't tag something" is like saying McfirstHHubUploader493 didn't tag something, and he is allowed a whole 4 of them so he sure got them all. It doesn't make any sense. They're not meant to be exhaustive in any way.
The images were posted back to back, of the same character, with the same hearts popping around her head and breathing heavily, the second image had heart eyes, and the third image had the same background and underwear as the second one
We are stretching the phrase 'no indication' here to the limit. Please chill out a little bit.
That is just how I interpreted those images, you're welcome to disagree but thinking I'm trying to pick a fight with you or have to chill is a bit weird?
I meant 'chill out' in the sense that you removed it swiftly after it was posted based on what to me seem rather rigid reasons. The adherence to rules is stringent to the point where disagreement between reasonable minds cannot find any room.
Seeing the above, if all that is not indicative that the images are related to one another, I struggle to understand how clear sequel status would need to be at a glance. Does it have to be explicitly Stated to be a sequel? To me, the word indication implied otherwise.
I'd disagree with that rule even if it were in place, mind you, but it's best to know what we are even talking about.
Seeing the above, if all that is not indicative that the images are related to one another, I struggle to understand how clear sequel status would need to be at a glance. Does it have to be explicitly Stated to be a sequel? To me, the word indication implied otherwise.
I'd disagree with that rule even if it were in place, mind you, but it's best to know what we are even talking about.
BugmenotEncore said:
I meant 'chill out' in the sense that you removed it swiftly after it was posted based on what to me seem rather rigid reasons. The adherence to rules is stringent to the point where disagreement between reasonable minds cannot find any room.
Seeing the above, if all that is not indicative that the images are related to one another, I struggle to understand how clear sequel status would need to be at a glance. Does it have to be explicitly Stated to be a sequel? To me, the word indication implied otherwise.
I'd disagree with that rule even if it were in place, mind you, but it's best to know what we are even talking about.
I meant 'chill out' in the sense that you removed it swiftly after it was posted based on what to me seem rather rigid reasons. The adherence to rules is stringent to the point where disagreement between reasonable minds cannot find any room.
Seeing the above, if all that is not indicative that the images are related to one another, I struggle to understand how clear sequel status would need to be at a glance. Does it have to be explicitly Stated to be a sequel? To me, the word indication implied otherwise.
I'd disagree with that rule even if it were in place, mind you, but it's best to know what we are even talking about.
I just happened to be checking the site at the time, that's all there is to it. I saw two posts I thought weren't MC related and being a mod, went ahead and deleted both of them. The only differences between this and the god knows how many other posts get deleted on a daily basis is that I decided to write up a slightly longer deletion reason than the standard "No MC" those posts usually get, and that you decided to bring it up for discussion I guess.
I must concede to the point that providing a reason for the removal is superior to that common alternative. In hindsight that is quite preferable.
Please continue to do so.
Please continue to do so.
