Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? original 55483
Artist
- ? melusinia (manipper) 5
- ? null (nyanpyoun) 7
General
- ? aware 5883
- ? bed 3682
- ? black hair 40814
- ? bracelet 2439
- ? brother and sister 561
- ? brown eyes 9070
- ? choker 7486
- ? feet 12175
- ? femsub 176630
- ? hoodie 717
- ? incest 1716
- ? indifferent 1241
- ? lying 3156
- ? maledom 47458
- ? miniskirt 2220
- ? panties 10764
- ? phone 3277
- ? pillow 598
- ? pov dom 4598
- ? short hair 54137
- ? socks 2661
- ? solo 27851
- ? tan lines 548
- ? upskirt 1401
Meta
- ? caption 10107
- ? caption only 3105
- ? manip 18082
- ? simple background 19880
- ? text 109589
Statistics
- Id: 257177
-
Posted: 2025-12-03 21:08:07
by melusinia - Size: 2144x1450
- Source: fantia.jp/posts/175187
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 157 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1

>> #593517
Score: 8 (vote Up)
>> #593531
Score: 6 (vote Up)
>> #593537
Score: 9 (vote Up)
>> #593640
Score: 3 (vote Up)
>> #594783
Score: 3 (vote Up)
I think it's the level of explaining to her owner what she is and her relationship is, and emphatically reasserting it? On a doylist level it makes sense, but on a Watsonian one it feels like our pov doesn't know what's going on either.
(I mean, I doubt he'd be complaining, but I wouldn't be shocked if the self-objectification [literal] was her interpretation of something that could also have been taken as "you are now my sex slave", where you can see how it's pretty close to where she landed, but not the only possible successful outcome.)
It's "a reading I find possible but unlikely" if he was aiming for something tamer, and she basically took something intended to be around "you won't mind/notice me checking you out" all the way to this. That would be particularly hot and funny imo though.