Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? alice in wonderland 72
- ? nintendo 21617
- ? pokemon 13778
- ? pokemon sun and moon 1082
Character
- ? alice 62
- ? gengar 195
- ? lillie (pokemon) 287
- ? pokemon (creature) 2325
- ? selene (pokemon) 128
Artist
- ? lairreverenteboladepelos 246
General
- ? alternate costume 3346
- ? black hair 30071
- ? blonde hair 32973
- ? bow 2126
- ? cake 95
- ? dress 4568
- ? drool 24998
- ? evil smile 3475
- ? expressionless 20301
- ? female only 56793
- ? femdom 30039
- ? food 618
- ? hair band 989
- ? hypnotized hypnotist 3699
- ? knife 98
- ? long hair 57847
- ? maid 3870
- ? milestone celebration 40
- ? multicolored eyes 471
- ? open mouth 46858
- ? parody 266
- ? pendulum 11751
- ? pocket watch 1622
- ? ponytail 12254
- ? short hair 40935
- ? smile 28589
- ? yuri 6318
Meta
- ? absurdres 34413
Statistics
- Id: 64294
-
Posted: 2018-05-16 09:42:22
by AnzuMazaki - Size: 2894x4093
- Source: hirotostar.deviantart.com/art/It-s-tea-time-745135445
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 165 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #252327
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #252331
Score: 0 (vote Up)
EDIT: Is this supposed to be the Mad Hatter card controlling Moon, or is it just a card in her head to loosely represent her as the Hatter?
>> #252351
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #252355
Score: 0 (vote Up)
EDIT: Is this supposed to be the Mad Hatter card controlling Moon, or is it just a card in her head to loosely represent her as the Hatter?
Per the sauce it's the former
>> #252388
Score: 0 (vote Up)
The artifacting is in the original
It still suffers from severe jpeg artifacting, whether it's in the original image or not shouldn't matter.
>> #252392
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It still suffers from severe jpeg artifacting, whether it's in the original image or not shouldn't matter.
It kinda does, though. If it were a manip, we could reasonably say that the manipper could have found a clearer version of the image, or barring that, should have used a different image entirely. But for original art, what the artist or commissioner makes available is all we have. Now, if it's drawn poorly, we obviously will reject it. This isn't, however. It was simply saved in less-than-desirable quality, although it does look fine in the resized version. It's unfortunate, but this is what we were given.
>> #252425
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #477090
Score: 0 (vote Up)