Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? love live! 268
- ? love live! school idol project 163
Character
- ? eli ayase 72
- ? hanayo koizumi 8
- ? honoka kousaka 21
- ? kotori minami 20
- ? maki nishikino 62
- ? nico yazawa 42
- ? nozomi toujou 90
- ? rin hoshizora 11
- ? umi sonoda 11
Artist
- ? sendy1992 36
General
- ? barefoot 11834
- ? black hair 29071
- ? blonde hair 32225
- ? blue eyes 16712
- ? blue hair 12894
- ? blush 36127
- ? bottomless 40399
- ? breasts 101790
- ? brown eyes 6346
- ? brown hair 28678
- ? expressionless 19854
- ? female only 55723
- ? green eyes 9151
- ? hair ribbon 1355
- ? long hair 57316
- ? multiple girls 14896
- ? multiple subs 9123
- ? nude 37507
- ? orange hair 5615
- ? ponytail 12044
- ? purple eyes 6496
- ? purple hair 10736
- ? red eyes 9205
- ? red hair 15464
- ? ribbon 3011
- ? short hair 40531
- ? spiral eyes 23381
- ? standing 12154
- ? standing at attention 5609
- ? symbol in eyes 31850
- ? topless 43952
- ? twintails 10611
- ? yellow eyes 4677
Meta
- ? absurdres 34145
- ? censored 6367
- ? text 79981
Statistics
- Id: 66637
-
Posted: 2018-07-10 07:40:53
by kirbysuper123 - Size: 3850x1900
- Source: www.deviantart.com/sendy1...n-Drawings-Muse-702074416
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 129 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #269377
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #269378
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I think kisekae is not allowed or something. Is that still true?
I don't think this is Kisekae. Just read the comments on parent post.
This is just re-upload of that post because of high quality.
>> #269392
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't think this is Kisekae. Just read the comments on parent post.
This is just re-upload of that post because of high quality.
Huh. I don't think I would've noticed this wasn't Kisekae if the comments there didn't say so. They look *a lot* like Kisekae girls, but the faces look too... distinctly shaded to be Kisekae. Plus, looking at a Kisekae picture, the shadows under the boobs look different. They don't look like thin footballs.
>> #269393
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Huh. I don't think I would've noticed this wasn't Kisekae if the comments there didn't say so. They look *a lot* like Kisekae girls, but the faces look too... distinctly shaded to be Kisekae. Plus, looking at a Kisekae picture, the shadows under the boobs look different. They don't look like thin footballs.
Still, I don't think there's prove that this is actually made using that.
>> #269401
Score: 0 (vote Up)
the legs (particularly the knees), hands, breasts, and hips are all definitely non-kisekae or redrawn.
it does look very paper doll copy/paste though, and I could swear we already had this argument about this exact image somewhere
>> #269449
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I think kisekae is not allowed or something. Is that still true?
Why wouldn't kisekae be allowed? Because of the flood of images? I kinda like it.
>> #269564
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #269953
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Why wouldn't kisekae be allowed? Because of the flood of images? I kinda like it.
Yeah, since everyone can use that and flood everything with they Kisekae story or something.
>> #269969
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Yeah, since everyone can use that and flood everything with they Kisekae story or something.
Yeah, I don't have a problem with it or anything. In fact, I like it, too. Wasn't trying to get it taken down or asking anyone to do it.
It's just that I thought I remembered there was some kind of rule about it once before, and was curious about that, so I was just asking if that was true or not. I had actually forgot.
But I also know that some people like to use these as a basis and do edits to it, so i'm guessing that's what this is.