Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? hyperdimension neptunia 318
Character
- ? noire 58
Artist
- ? oekakizuki 16
- ? rize (manipper) 30
General
- ? beach 907
- ? bikini 4944
- ? black hair 29640
- ? blush 36465
- ? breasts 102751
- ? cleavage 22796
- ? collarbone 7213
- ? expressionless 20117
- ? female only 56462
- ? femdom 29991
- ? femsub 130912
- ? hair ribbon 1393
- ? happy trance 46445
- ? hypnotic drug 875
- ? large breasts 58117
- ? long hair 57702
- ? lying 2067
- ? open mouth 46728
- ? red eyes 9321
- ? ribbon 3048
- ? spiral eyes 23647
- ? swimsuit 2947
- ? symbol in eyes 32072
- ? twintails 10720
- ? water 372
- ? yuri 6281
Meta
- ? caption 8899
- ? caption only 2822
- ? manip 16597
- ? text 81490
Statistics
- Id: 67926
-
Posted: 2018-08-10 05:20:02
by Rize - Size: 2000x1500
- Source: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=4370745
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 158 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #274463
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Please remember to tag the original artists, and include a source link.
>> #274476
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #275143
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #275145
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm pretty sure "Massive text wall" isn't a legit reason to delete anything.
Rules have been updated for text manips
Text manips with little relation to what is portrayed in the image or has excessive grammar and spelling errors
>> #275146
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Rules have been updated for text manips
Text manips with little relation to what is portrayed in the image or has excessive grammar and spelling errors
Yeah, but I can see "Reason: Massive text wall". That doesn't sound like a issue.
If you are really deleting manips to fit new rules, then at least tell people exacly what's the issue.
I didn't saw this post, so I'm not sure if the story was so massive and complex that it didn't go with the image or if there were some grammar/spelling errors.
And I think manipper doesn't know that too.
>> #275147
Score: 0 (vote Up)
(The original looked better, imgur put a bunch of artifacts on it)
And while the story is a bit longer than my usual, it's not that long, especially compared to other manips from other users, that are still here.
>> #275151
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This is the post: i.imgur.com/kO10L1I.jpg
(The original looked better, imgur put a bunch of artifacts on it)
And while the story is a bit longer than my usual, it's not that long, especially compared to other manips from other users, that are still here.
This is great, why the hell was that deleted?
>> #275157
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This is great, why the hell was that deleted?
Are you kidding?
look at the crude manip job on the eyes also the size of the text compared to image and also the background.
>> #275158
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Are you kidding?
look at the crude manip job on the eyes also the size of the text compared to image and also the background.
Are YOU kidding?
The reason for deleting this is "massive text wall", how is that even related to the eyes on the picture?
Actually, what's wrong with her eyes? They look fine to me, what rules are they breaking?
Size of the text and background are also okay, because you can read all of this withouth any problems.
It really looks like a mod just said "nah, fuck it, I don't like it"
>> #275160
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Are you kidding?
look at the crude manip job on the eyes also the size of the text compared to image and also the background.
What? I've used those eyes in at least 6 manips before, the effect isn't that easy to do, I bet you can't replicate it, and the original eyes were slowly deleted to a pixel level precision, I even kept the original hair transparencies over the eyes, the text looks perfectly fine without jpeg artifacts that imgur adds once you see the image in full size, it's size 24 in photoshop, that isn't small. The background is just a color to contrast the dialogue, if it's too bright that can be easily changed, but nobody said anything while the image was still here, so that didn't look like a reason for deletion either.