kirux
02/05/17 04:18AM
plsignore said:
"drugged" feels like it's redundant. I don't think there are many cases where drugs are in the image and they're *not* being used.


Sometimes there are no drugs in the picture but it's implied that they were/are drugged though.

Edit: Let me state it another way, if I was in the mood to look at some porn of someone that was drugged and hypnotized, the person being "drugged" in this case, either by medical drugs, illicit, or even potions, has more visual impact and easier to tag. While there may not be drugs in the picture of a manip per say, it can still be stated that the person in question is high/whatever, without drugs being in the picture. I think drugged is the most important visual and obvious for searching purposes.

Also drugged is a tag on gelbooru as well.
kirux
02/08/17 03:07AM
Originally posted in the vent room but I'll retype it here.


kirux said:
I've always wondered why on earth we have a nightmare_fuel tag. It's not on other booru's, the definition feels like a violation of the subjective rule ("tag for posts that are dark and twisted.") and feels redundant when we have a blacklist system. While I know we are working on the comments with the new moderation positions (thank you Henry) this just seems like a problem to me when you have a tag like that. And now it's caused Firemario and other's trouble in such a severe way as a tasteless nonconstructive insult almost. Perhaps update the definition to be less subjective to solve at least that one problem and the comment mods can fix useless comments but still, it doesn't sit right.



ErrantRealityA said:
I generally agree with this sentiment. Even having looked through the pictures tagged with nightmare_fuel, it doesn't really seem there is a clear, objective definition of nightmare_fuel. (Which is why I personally don't use it.) I've seen a lot of people use the tag on things they find creepy, and then the tag later gets removed.

If I had to provide a solution to replace the tag, here's what I'd do:
- Remove the tag
- Add a creepy_face tag (would apply to deformed, distorted, or lifeless faces and would cover 75% or more of the nightmare_fuel images)
- Use the parasite tag more liberally (any time someone has some foreign life form coming out of their mouth or genitals)
- Use the insect tag more consistently, where appropriate
- Use the brain_injection tag where appropriate
- Add tags for brain eating and possibly something dealing with implied or imminent death.

The problem seems to be that the nightmare_fuel tag is being used to cover all of these different situations, so it's not really clear what it's purpose is.


kirux said:
I feel like you wouldn't need to do creepy_face(still feels subjective) as much as distorted_anatomy(vs exaggerated_anatomy when someone has ahegao, or unreasonably large breats but not in a terrifying way). This would also cover body parts that are arranged in such a way to be disturbing including face, though you could have both I suppose.

As for brain-eating, I mostly see the nightmare_fuel in that case added to pictures that have pseudo zombie like qualities. (The ones where mushrooms are growing out of obviously deceased if not soon to be deceased people). And just be more liberal with a zombie tag or something similar for those implied to be killed during the hypnosis process.


Sorry if this isn't the appropriate way to present it here but I was asked to move it out of the vent room thread.
JB-007
02/09/17 03:27AM
Can we get a clarification on when something is 'sexuality change'

Because there's mutliple instances of things being removed and added when there is obvious changes in established characters 'sexuality' and in the manip and when there isn't.

i.e.

most of wonder woman's yuri stuff. I.e.

hypnohub.net/post/show/29...mless-corruption-costume-

hypnohub.net/post/show/42...less-cheetah-dc_comics-fe

and "hinata wants to be not shy.....ends with her wanting to be ino's 'personal sex slave'"

hypnohub.net/post/show/37...omless-comic-earrings-fem

and less sexuality change and more just....standard bimbofication

hypnohub.net/post/show/44...ation-boots-brown_hair-cl
RedCollarBlackCollar
02/09/17 04:04AM
JB-007 said:
and less sexuality change and more just....standard bimbofication

hypnohub.net/post/show/44...ation-boots-brown_hair-cl


But it's not just "standard bimbofication."

It's part of an image pool where that character explicitly had her sexuality changed.
hypnohub.net/post/show/43389
kirux
02/09/17 06:39AM
JB-007 said:
Can we get a clarification on when something is 'sexuality change'

Because there's mutliple instances of things being removed and added when there is obvious changes in established characters 'sexuality' and in the manip and when there isn't.

As far as the Mindwipe said in the vent room thread. It doesn't apply to transgender pics (like bimboification transgender pics where a guy is turned into a girl who has sex with guys) nor does it matter what the canon sexuality of the character is. It has to be explicitly stated that the character has one sexuality at the start and has it changed.

i.e. We do not care if canonically Hinata from Naruto is straight and there's a manip that has her as a lesbian. It has to have her turning straight to lesbian or vice versa in the manip/art.
RedCollarBlackCollar
02/27/17 02:44AM
Created a "webpage_layout" tag for some of those Lyoko pics I helped put together. Wondering if there's any ideas for a better name, and whether or not stuff outside of just webpages (such as Skype <____< or like Facebook could apply).
NinjaW
02/27/17 03:13AM
Created a "monochrome_(color_scheme)" tag for images that follow a black-and-white color scheme. Or do we have a tag for that?
Mindwipe
02/27/17 03:20AM
NinjaW said:
Created a "monochrome_(color_scheme)" tag for images that follow a black-and-white color scheme. Or do we have a tag for that?


"greyscale"
RedCollarBlackCollar
03/16/17 04:23PM
Birthday tag added, as we have ones for specific holidays.
I think this can work nicely for any pics that actually celebrate birthdays as the actual content, and not just pics that one user makes for another.
RedCollarBlackCollar
03/29/17 07:09PM
I think we need to discuss the point of the "Asian" tag.
>Does this only apply to the real content?
>If not, do we have to tag every fictional character that would happen to be Asian (like Chun-Li), or every character from Asia (which would result in a lot of anime pics, I assume, being tagged as such). Unsure why Miraculous Ladybug keeps getting tagged if that's not the case.
>Does this also mean that we'd have to tag other races/ethnicities as well...?
>Lastly, while I've heard the argument that Egyptian may also seem like an unnecessary tag, I figure that it's more representative of the iconic historical culture, and not the ethnicity that we could apply to characters like Pharah or Ana from Overwatch. Otherwise, would we have to get into tagging all those other ones as well?
Friye
03/29/17 07:57PM
RedCollarBlackCollar said:
[...]
Unsure why Miraculous Ladybug keeps getting tagged if that's not the case.
[...]


If it's for every character that happens to be Asian, then Marinette Dupain-Cheng (aka Ladybug) is correct to be tagged that way. She's half-asian I suppose... I don't know, something-something I'm sorry I know I'm racist ._.
RedCollarBlackCollar
03/29/17 08:05PM
Friye said:
If it's for every character that happens to be Asian, then Marinette Dupain-Cheng (aka Ladybug) is correct to be tagged that way. She's half-asian I suppose... I don't know, something-something I'm sorry I know I'm racist ._.


...how the Hell are you/would u be racist tho...?
I'm half Asian (Korean to be exact), and idc about the character being tagged or not as Asian.
I'm just wondering if this is something that we would need to apply for all characters, or only the real content. Cause if it's not the latter, there's a whole lotta characters that will need to be tagged...
Vanndril
03/31/17 05:19AM
The Egyptian tag is meant to be used when characters in images are obviously designed with an egyptian theme in mind. This usually involves characters wearing egyptian-inspired outfits and jewelry. It's original intent wasn't to be a ethnicity tag, and I'd argue it still isn't.

Ethnicity tags for drawn art are something we should avoid in general, as it can become very confusing very quickly, to the point of almost being arbitrary.
RedCollarBlackCollar
03/31/17 05:23AM
Vanndril said:
The Egyptian tag is meant to be used when characters in images are obviously designed with an egyptian theme in mind. This usually involves characters wearing egyptian-inspired outfits and jewelry. It's original intent wasn't to be a ethnicity tag, and I'd argue it still isn't.

While I'm not sure if the asian tag was designed for that purpose, I'd certainly use it that way.

Ethnicity tags are something we should avoid in general, as it can become very confusing very quickly, to the point of almost being arbitrary.


As I figured.

If that's the case, do we even need the tag? Why not remove it and any like them altogether...?
Vanndril
03/31/17 05:25AM
Actually, I was wrong entirely. I had forgotten that we added and defined the Asian tag so, so long ago. I thought someone added it recently.

It only applies to real content. Basically, only thing tagged with [[real]] and that involve a person who is presumably asian should have the tag.

I edited my above post to avoid confusion.
<<< 2 3456>>>


Reply | Forum Index