This thread is for discussing questions and concerns regarding tags used by HypnoHub.

With the creation of our new [[help:tag creation policy|Tag Creation Policy]], this new thread was created to replace the <<hypnohub.net/forum/show/8844|old Official Tags Thread>>.

hypnohub.net/post?tags=premature_ejaculation

hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=premature_ejaculation

So, according to this, any hands-free orgasm is premature ejaculation. I don't see that working with this site, considering hypnotic orgasms are extremely common, and often occur with no physical stimulus.

Also, you forgot to mention in the tag creation policy that new tags should only be for subjects that aren't adequately covered by other tags or tag combinations.

Also, the new tag creation policy is terrible.

Yeah, pretty much. How about we use hands_free_orgasm instead? That should adequately cover those images, and doesn't actually seem to be something tagged here yet unless I'm missing it.

I've removed a few posts under "human furniture" that I found to not be related to transforming people into inanimate objects, be it metaphorically (like someone sitting on somebody on all fours) or literally (like that Tracer vacuum nightmare fuel post). A few of those posts involved a girl getting fucked as she's sitting on a guy's lap, while he's sitting on a chair of his own. That doesn't count, right...?

EDIT: I've also removed a few involving girls acting as mannequins; I suppose that might count to a certain extent, if so, I'll have to go back and revert the ones I removed. I just felt would make more sense for the tag if they were actually like modeling clothes, or holding it like a coat rack... [shrug]
hypnohub.net/post/show/41421
hypnohub.net/post/show/36230

Slightly updated definition to fix that.



Slight update for this, too.



To be honest, we've already been letting users do more or less this for a number of months. All I did was make it official and write it down. I doubt many cons will come of it.

...But I've been surprised before. I guess we'll see.



That doesn't count, you're correct. I mean, that's hardly using either character as furniture more than any other sex position that involves sitting or straddling.

We very well could create the tag. Your logic is sound.

So, I saw that a sexuality_change tag has been created as per my suggestion on that shit storm pic, and I took the liberty of defining it based on what I believe was the main criteria that was brought up. However, I see that most of the pics currently using the tag don't seem to fit that definition. Am I just missing something? Should the definition be something else? Help me out here, guys.

Just remove any that don't seem to explicitly state a character not being into guys/chicks (couple examples I could think of) and then being changed to not think that anymore.

EDIT: I've removed the ones I felt didn't really belong. If there is reason for the tag to apply, I'd like to hear why; not that I'm the only one who must approve, I'd just like to know is all. Some of em do seem a bit random without context given as for why they were chosen.
[spoilers]
hypnohub.net/post/show/28643
hypnohub.net/post/show/31601
All posts in this pool: hypnohub.net/pool/show/1086
All posts in this pool: hypnohub.net/pool/show/854
And this pool: hypnohub.net/pool/show/1483
hypnohub.net/post/show/20709
hypnohub.net/post/show/37929
hypnohub.net/post/show/11527
hypnohub.net/post/show/14629
hypnohub.net/post/show/42231
hypnohub.net/post/show/20709
And this: hypnohub.net/pool/show/1368
hypnohub.net/post/show/4969
hypnohub.net/post/show/17319 + Child Post
[/spoilers]

Okay, so who the fuck approved changing the "hypno" tag to "there_is_no_point_to_a_'hypno'_tag_on_hypnohub"? There is a point when it's the name of the fucking character, dipshit.

Edit: OH EVEN BETTER! It's broken! Now no one can search for "hypno" or the ridiculous tag it was replaced with. It just returns blank results. Good fucking job, whoever you are. gg. play of the game.

Alright, I fixed that massive fuck up, I think. The stupid aliases for hypno and hypnosis are gone and hypno_(pokemon) is back to being just hypno. That tag has been fine for years. There's no need to add the pokemon append to it now.

This happened? XD

That's ridiculous. Amusing, but ridiculous. Thanks for your hard work on fixing that.

Also, sorry for how ragey those posts were. I was already pretty irritated by other stuff, and then I ran into that problem while trying to tag 8 uploads and that sent me over the edge. I'm good now.

Drugs, drugged, drug, hypnotic drugs... What should we keep/remove?

To me, drugs should only be there if you can see real-word materials related to drug use (i.e. needles not potions).(Though I'm shaky on this as for how many posts it could apply to) Drug is redundant for drugs. Drugged is useful because some people do enjoy a person who is visible impaired by chemicals, but it would have to be obvious it had to do with drugs and not plain old hypnosis. And something just feels off about "hypnotic drugs" to me but I can't put it into words exactly.

"drug" is ungrammatical in most instances imo. Toss it.

"drugs" is more grammatical. Alias the former to the latter, and make sure they're both being used correctly i.e. someone should probably edit the wiki to give a more exact definition.

"drugged" feels like it's redundant. I don't think there are many cases where drugs are in the image and they're *not* being used.

"hypnotic drugs" has a different meaning, keep it. Maybe consider adding a tag parent of "drugs" to it, as well.



I kinda get what you mean, but the term has a very specific use case here that seems appropriate. Not all drugs are 'hypnotic'. If you can think of a better term for "drugs used for mind control" feel free to suggest it.