Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? skullgirls 169
Character
- ? filia (skullgirls) 25
Artist
- ? e10 1
General
- ? blush 37282
- ? breasts 105342
- ? brown hair 29815
- ? empty eyes 36744
- ? erect nipples 16738
- ? femdom 30438
- ? large breasts 58833
- ? long hair 58720
- ? looking at viewer 12838
- ? looking back 1642
- ? male pov 2165
- ? pov 8698
- ? pov sub 5044
- ? sweat 11523
- ? thighhighs 17898
Meta
- ? caption 8959
- ? manip 16722
- ? text 84141
Statistics
- Id: 11065
-
Posted: 2013-12-10 03:27:59
by shadowbeowolf - Size: 1231x1000
- Source: www.gelbooru.com/index.ph...amp;s=view&id=1916647
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 76 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #5795
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #5796
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #5797
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #5799
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #5805
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #5825
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Maybe a 'ViewerSub' tag would be useful?
>> #5835
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #5854
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Maybe a 'ViewerSub' tag would be useful?
Isn't that what the "POV" tag is for?
>> #5872
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Isn't that what the "POV" tag is for?
For the most part. I mean, a good chunk of PoV images are viewer sub. But alas, not all, so it still doesn't really fit the bill.
On one hand, I recognize the desire to not have to read the last sentence of a manip to know if it's viewer sub or dom, but at the same time, I don't like the idea of having a tag based entirely on what the text states. Obviously, I can't have both things...
I dunno. It's certainly something to think on.
I don't want to blacklist femdom, as that would cut out the pics of one girl hypnotizing another.
I did a little thinking, and just remember that this may help. You should blacklist this:
All in one blacklist entry.
What this will do is blacklist images that have the femdom but don't also have femsub tagged. This way, only images that are not of girls hypnotizing other girls will be blacklisted.
>> #8381
Score: 0 (vote Up)