Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? touhou 2387
Character
- ? flandre scarlet 59
Artist
- ? kenpi 23
General
- ? blonde hair 33797
- ? blush 37376
- ? bottomless 41631
- ? dazed 12763
- ? empty eyes 36806
- ? expressionless 20799
- ? female only 58220
- ? femsub 134894
- ? hat 7200
- ? heart 11521
- ? heart eyes 9732
- ? long hair 58822
- ? open clothes 5990
- ? panties 8532
- ? ponytail 12614
- ? shirt lift 1754
- ? sweat 11571
- ? symbol in eyes 32735
- ? underwear 11528
- ? wings 3632
Meta
- ? text 84410
- ? translation request 7944
Statistics
- Id: 28078
-
Posted: 2015-08-04 01:10:14
by Mindwipe - Size: 777x1087
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=51770332
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 53 (vote up)
>> #65714
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #65718
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Need lolicon tag.
No it doesn't. That body is not the body of a loli.
>> #65723
Score: 0 (vote Up)
No it doesn't. That body is not the body of a loli.
I politely disagree. It does look underage to me - not outright "child", but nowhere near "adult".
Better to be safe than sorry.
>> #65724
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #65725
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #65734
Score: 0 (vote Up)
And I'm going to keep removing the tag, because she is far too developed in this pic to be a loli. She has very clearly-defined breasts and wide hips. Lolis have flat chests and practically no curve to their figure at all. Honestly, the breasts alone disqualify this from being loli.
... Then I'm just going to keep re-adding it, because there is seriously no way in hell she *isn't* loli.
Yes, there are breasts. Girls can start getting breasts as early as 8 years old, so that's precisely ZERO indication of adulthood.
And wide hips? They still look decisively little-girl to me.
>> #65735
Score: 0 (vote Up)
... Then I'm just going to keep re-adding it, because there is seriously no way in hell she *isn't* loli.
Yes, there are breasts. Girls can start getting breasts as early as 8 years old, so that's precisely ZERO indication of adulthood.
And wide hips? They still look decisively little-girl to me.
This does not fit our tag definition for <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=loli|loli.>> There's some pretty significant curvature on her.
>> #65738
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This does not fit our tag definition for <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=loli|loli.>> There's some pretty significant curvature on her.
Then there's a bunch of other pictures that should have the Loli tag removed as well - too many that I cba to list them all.
And I still argue it fits "looks prepubescent" to a T. "generally marked by" =/= "always has this".
>> #65739
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Then there's a bunch of other pictures that should have the Loli tag removed as well - too many that I cba to list them all.
Again, other pictures having the tag, do not qualify as a valid reason for this one getting it as well. It's a case by case decision, with the rules clearly outlined. If you see other pictures that do not deserve the loli tag, remove it and add a comment.
>> #65740
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Again, other pictures having the tag, do not qualify as a valid reason for this one getting it as well. It's a case by case decision, with the rules clearly outlined. If you see other pictures that do not deserve the loli tag, remove it and add a comment.
Except I'm arguing the other way in this case - this picture needs a loli tag because she (to me, at least) appears prepubescent. This is then verified by other pictures that have already gotten a loli tag and have roughly the same build of body.