Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? puyo puyo 83
Character
- ? arle 25
Artist
- ? professor-celestino (manipper) 65
- ? ramaz191 48
General
- ? bikini armor 173
- ? brown eyes 6685
- ? brown hair 29653
- ? dazed 12702
- ? female only 57841
- ? femsub 133864
- ? open mouth 47472
- ? smile 29017
- ? staff 466
- ? symbol in eyes 32531
Statistics
- Id: 36371
-
Posted: 2016-05-08 17:12:49
by Professor-Celestino - Size: 2560x1600
- Source: professor-celestino.deviantart.com/art/reiMage-590283698
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 12 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #102933
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Also, it totally makes me think of the Good Dinosaur. Awesomely realistic background, cartoony characters.... ^_^
>> #102958
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I wonder how the QCC will react.
I'll be forwarding it to them.
>> #103011
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #103051
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #103231
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't think this even needs our call. Real manips are forbidden and the rules do not clearly state which part of the manip needs to be the real one or if it is a mixup or not. As far as I am concerned, the QCC does not need to vote on borderline rule issues because it isn't related to Quality. It's an admin decision.
Huh. Good point.
Is this considered a real manip, or a drawn manip? o.O
Hm...
I'll have to think on this. But in the meantime, I'd like the QCC to vote on the matter regardless, in case we decide it doesn't break that rule.
>> #103376
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Ehh, guess it's not your style.
>and even worse what the FUCK are those eyes?
fuck off
>> #103377
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>the cartoonish artstyle in contrast with the real photo
Ehh, guess it's not your style.
>and even worse what the FUCK are those eyes?
fuck off
*Opens fold-out chair*
*Grabs popcorn*
>> #103379
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #103398
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #103428
Score: 0 (vote Up)
The only reason this was brought up was the background - that's not what the QCC should decide on. I can understand why the first idea was to bring it to a vote - it was good intention, but I think this is a case where we push the question of if it is fine to use real backgrounds in a manip (which has been done in anime for ages) to a quality based decision - which it is not. The QCC is neither here to uphold the rules of pictures, nor to limit artists creativity - we are here to provide a very basic quality control.
Don't get me wrong - I am not against voting for it, but there is no point to do it.