Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? alice in wonderland 72
- ? nintendo 21889
- ? pokemon 13916
- ? pokemon sun and moon 1090
Character
- ? alice 62
- ? gengar 195
- ? lillie (pokemon) 289
- ? pokemon (creature) 2356
- ? selene (pokemon) 128
Artist
- ? lairreverenteboladepelos 250
General
- ? alternate costume 3388
- ? black hair 30858
- ? blonde hair 33537
- ? bow 2176
- ? cake 95
- ? dress 4685
- ? drool 25458
- ? evil smile 3533
- ? expressionless 20650
- ? female only 57829
- ? femdom 30349
- ? food 647
- ? hair band 1020
- ? hypnotized hypnotist 3760
- ? knife 99
- ? long hair 58520
- ? maid 3953
- ? milestone celebration 40
- ? multicolored eyes 477
- ? open mouth 47464
- ? parody 267
- ? pendulum 11923
- ? pocket watch 1645
- ? ponytail 12472
- ? short hair 41296
- ? smile 29012
- ? yuri 6383
Meta
- ? absurdres 34808
Statistics
- Id: 64294
-
Posted: 2018-05-16 09:42:22
by AnzuMazaki - Size: 2894x4093
- Source: hirotostar.deviantart.com/art/It-s-tea-time-745135445
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 166 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #252327
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #252331
Score: 0 (vote Up)
EDIT: Is this supposed to be the Mad Hatter card controlling Moon, or is it just a card in her head to loosely represent her as the Hatter?
>> #252351
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #252355
Score: 0 (vote Up)
EDIT: Is this supposed to be the Mad Hatter card controlling Moon, or is it just a card in her head to loosely represent her as the Hatter?
Per the sauce it's the former
>> #252388
Score: 0 (vote Up)
The artifacting is in the original
It still suffers from severe jpeg artifacting, whether it's in the original image or not shouldn't matter.
>> #252392
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It still suffers from severe jpeg artifacting, whether it's in the original image or not shouldn't matter.
It kinda does, though. If it were a manip, we could reasonably say that the manipper could have found a clearer version of the image, or barring that, should have used a different image entirely. But for original art, what the artist or commissioner makes available is all we have. Now, if it's drawn poorly, we obviously will reject it. This isn't, however. It was simply saved in less-than-desirable quality, although it does look fine in the resized version. It's unfortunate, but this is what we were given.
>> #252425
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #477090
Score: 0 (vote Up)