Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? rwby 1590
Character
- ? ruby rose 424
- ? weiss schnee 385
Artist
- ? iesupa 2
- ? litter (manipper) 15
General
- ? black hair 30864
- ? blue eyes 17408
- ? blush 37129
- ? clothed 7564
- ? consensual 1445
- ? dress 4685
- ? female only 57843
- ? ponytail 12480
- ? short hair 41300
- ? side ponytail 1098
- ? smile 29020
- ? white hair 8255
- ? wholesome 594
- ? yuri 6383
Meta
- ? absurdres 34815
- ? caption 8944
- ? manip 16689
- ? text 83858
Statistics
- Id: 65913
-
Posted: 2018-06-22 23:32:36
by Litter - Size: 5000x1925
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=50297922
- Rating: Safe
- Score: 35 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #266686
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I hope you like reading.
>> #266798
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #266819
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Are they underage?
No they are teenagers
>> #266865
Score: 0 (vote Up)
(also, unrelated note: the "underage" tag is covered in scope by "loli" and "shota" and thus redundant. I removed that a while ago.)
Ruby and Weiss are "of age", but the characters in this image sure as heck don't *look* like them.
>> #267284
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Are they underage?
Even if they are underage, posts of illustrated characters do not warrant for a flag.
If they were underage images of real children or teens, that would be a completely different issue.
>> #267473
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #343695
Score: 0 (vote Up)
No they are teenagers
*facepalm* That's like saying "No, grapes aren't fruit, they're berries." IDK why Chrislangster even asked when they're so obviously kids.