Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? fate/grand order 1905
- ? fate (series) 2545
Character
- ? florence nightingale 40
- ? minamoto no raikou 102
Artist
- ? ni crying 19
- ? nobody67 (manipper) 72
General
- ? aphrodisiac 234
- ? bikini 5103
- ? breasts 105527
- ? cameltoe 2069
- ? clothed exposure 4405
- ? femdom 30494
- ? high heels 10220
- ? huge breasts 22718
- ? hypnotic drug 886
- ? injection 713
- ? kneeling 7349
- ? large breasts 58901
- ? long hair 58826
- ? looking at viewer 12851
- ? micro bikini 1413
- ? needle 452
- ? pov 8735
- ? pov sub 5050
- ? purple hair 11457
- ? see-through 2404
- ? spread legs 9118
- ? syringe 315
- ? thighhighs 17947
Meta
- ? caption 8965
- ? caption only 2834
- ? manip 16757
- ? text 84412
Statistics
- Id: 76123
-
Posted: 2019-03-07 23:46:45
by Nobody67 - Size: 1850x1100
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=65644679
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 177 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #307696
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307697
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307699
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307763
Score: 0 (vote Up)
thats a dick move
I mean, she never technically lied: she says that one syringe contains "sub" serum (technically true, but so does the other one), and then says "if you were to take 'dom' serum..." NOT that the other syringe has "dom" serum.
But still, yes, definitely a dick move.
>> #307788
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307791
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307792
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Joke's on her - both of them would be sub because that's not how you use a darn antidote, stupid lil big-tiddy BEEYATCH
I mean... you're not fucking wrong.....
>> #307944
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm getting serious Princess Bride vibes here.....
[spoiler=sub serum]iocane powder[/spoiler]
>> #307992
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm getting serious Princess Bride vibes here.....
didn't the guy who wrote that book die in January?
>> #349283
Score: 0 (vote Up)
[spoiler=sub serum]iocane powder[/spoiler]
Finally somebody else who understands the reference! Too bad you got to the post before me...