Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? dc comics 4841
- ? superman (series) 566
Character
- ? power girl 345
Artist
- ? tiechonortheal (manipper) 411
General
- ? blonde hair 33544
- ? blue eyes 17408
- ? breasts 104873
- ? cleavage 23185
- ? cleavage cutout 544
- ? denial 538
- ? female only 57841
- ? femsub 133864
- ? finger snap 714
- ? large breasts 58671
- ? leotard 5046
- ? maledom 36104
- ? muscle girl 1706
- ? open clothes 5970
- ? pendulum 11927
- ? pocket watch 1645
- ? short hair 41299
- ? super hero 6272
- ? unaware 5768
Meta
- ? manip 16689
- ? text 83858
Statistics
- Id: 77763
-
Posted: 2019-04-05 17:32:44
by tiechonortheal - Size: 1267x757
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 164 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #312881
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #312884
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #312895
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #312903
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #312924
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Sad to say that I am in possession of neither of those pieces of information.
If you have the original non-manipped version, you can try a reverse image search for it.
>> #312930
Score: 0 (vote Up)
If you have the original non-manipped version, you can try a reverse image search for it.
I don't. As I've said in the past, I'm not in the habit of prioritizing providing a bibliography for the manips I make. I'm not running a Patreon, asking people for money, or profiting from it in any way, so I don't feel bad about it. I'll tag an artist if it's obvious/I got it from their accounts/sites, but the moment it becomes a chore, I'm out. I'm fairly certain that I found this image on rule34 a week or so ago. There was no obvious artist tagged at the time.
>> #312939
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't. As I've said in the past, I'm not in the habit of prioritizing providing a bibliography for the manips I make. I'm not running a Patreon, asking people for money, or profiting from it in any way, so I don't feel bad about it. I'll tag an artist if it's obvious/I got it from their accounts/sites, but the moment it becomes a chore, I'm out. I'm fairly certain that I found this image on rule34 a week or so ago. There was no obvious artist tagged at the time.
You really don’t have to provide a “bibliography”, and it really shouldn’t be a chore. If anything, crediting the artist is the least you can do for editing their work.
>> #312942
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #312957
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Crediting the artist and citing the source is literally a bibliography. I'll do it when it's convenient for me. As I've said, I don't feel bad about any of this, as I'm not monetizing it in any way. As I think I've shown, the least that I can do is quite a bit less than your standard, and I'm fine with it.
This right here is a massive yikes.
Not to mention incredibly pretentious and insulting to the people that create the original works.
>> #312961
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Crediting the artist and citing the source is literally a bibliography. I'll do it when it's convenient for me. As I've said, I don't feel bad about any of this, as I'm not monetizing it in any way. As I think I've shown, the least that I can do is quite a bit less than your standard, and I'm fine with it.
Uh dude, I totally empathize with not wanting to hunt down image sources, but without the original artists you'd be out of a hobby. Even if you're not making money off it, the artists can't make more art as easily if you don't help people find their work. Don't be a dick.