Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? yu-gi-oh! 1724
- ? yu-gi-oh! gx 559
Character
- ? alexis rhodes 465
- ? tea gardner 341
Artist
- ? malroth 139
General
- ? blonde hair 33544
- ? blue eyes 17408
- ? breasts 104874
- ? brown hair 29653
- ? collar 13801
- ? dancer 789
- ? empty eyes 36612
- ? expressionless 20654
- ? femsub 133867
- ? gloves 14884
- ? harem outfit 2404
- ? large breasts 58671
- ? long hair 58529
- ? maid 3953
- ? see-through 2384
- ? short hair 41299
- ? thighhighs 17835
- ? yellow eyes 4834
Meta
- ? simple background 11143
>> #748
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #749
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #753
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #756
Score: 0 (vote Up)
* Mindwipe: Fuck, I don't think we need the "dancer" tag. It looks like it's just "dancing slave_outfit".
** Which makes me wonder about the "belly dancer" tag too.
* Vanndril: we HAVE slave_outfit?
* Mindwipe: Yes.
* Vanndril: that seems...pointless
** that IS pointless
* Mindwipe: Honestly, the "slave outfit" looks like a belly dancer outfit.
* Vanndril: slave_outfit is a meaningless all-encompassing tag
** it covers so much ground while meaning nothing
** each part of the "slave outfit" should be tagged instead
** like collar or harness
** in addition
** belly_dancer shouldn't even be tagged slave_outfit
** so delete the shit out of the slave_outfit tag
Pretty much all you, bro. :P
>> #757
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Pretty much all you, bro. :P
Ah, yes, so it was. I remember now. :P My issue with it was that it was entirely subjective. A slave outfit could have been anything, and anything that made an outfit stand out as a slave outfit can, itself, be tagged.