Search
(Supports wildcard *)Artist
- ? cang se ye hua 2
- ? jjmayoboy (manipper) 113
General
- ? bondage 6933
- ? breasts 103605
- ? collar 13655
- ? confused 2448
- ? consensual 1432
- ? exhibitionism 1431
- ? female only 57036
- ? femsub 132259
- ? humor 2843
- ? leash 1917
- ? nipple piercing 2557
- ? piercing 3822
- ? pov 8609
- ? rope 666
- ? shibari 179
- ? urination 1194
Meta
- ? caption 8913
- ? manip 16632
- ? tagme 5867
- ? text 82449
Statistics
- Id: 110959
-
Posted: 2021-02-06 23:39:05
by JJMayoBoy - Size: 1920x959
- Source: rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3983985
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 246 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #405374
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This post is a reupload, the original had some grammar errors and I forgot to color in the text. RIP post 110925
>> #405391
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Never seen it used for hypnosis, though
>> #405418
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #405452
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #405455
Score: 0 (vote Up)
TAG YOUR FUCKING PISS FETISH!
Is a pair of mentions of it in reference to a previous in-universe incident that is not the focus of the manip really something that warrants the urination tag? It's barely a feature of the text, much less the pic.
>> #405456
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #405471
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #405475
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Is a pair of mentions of it in reference to a previous in-universe incident that is not the focus of the manip really something that warrants the urination tag? It's barely a feature of the text, much less the pic.
Yes. Yes it fucking is. The manip includes it, so it needs to be tagged. Because people who block those tags do so for a reason.
>> #405479
Score: 0 (vote Up)
TAG YOUR FUCKING PISS FETISH!
Hey sorry bro. I was more or less just trying to make a reason why she would bring extra clothes with her and that was the first thing that came to mind. I thought that just sort of mentioning it briefly wouldn’t be enough to warrant a tag but I probably just should’ve been safe. I was also just a bit worried people would be mad at me for including it in a post that doesn’t actively have any urination. Thanks for calling me out, I’ll be sure to make sure anything potentially disturbing like that is tagged for safety in future posts, and sorry if it disturbed you that wasn’t never my intention.
>> #405483
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Hey sorry bro. I was more or less just trying to make a reason why she would bring extra clothes with her and that was the first thing that came to mind. I thought that just sort of mentioning it briefly wouldn’t be enough to warrant a tag but I probably just should’ve been safe. I was also just a bit worried people would be mad at me for including it in a post that doesn’t actively have any urination. Thanks for calling me out, I’ll be sure to make sure anything potentially disturbing like that is tagged for safety in future posts, and sorry if it disturbed you that wasn’t never my intention.
Hey, thanks man. Sorry for coming off so intense. It's always better to over tag than under, though.