Considered doing parent post/child post, but I have no idea if this is a valid reason to. So ... I didn't. XD Lemme know if I should have though [the only reason I entertained it, was because this pic is a continuation of the link above.]
GOD, how much you've improved. This is excellent. One day soon, I won't be swamped with college work and will actually be able to sit down and think of what I want to commission from you. <.<
Also, parent/child applies here. Sequences with only two images are considered parent/child. But if a third image enters the sequence, it needs a pool.
Welp, that's definitely good to know! Since there's another continuation pic that Vorp has commissioned me to do XD .... that I still need to sketch out >>
And Vandrill... I know! It's shocking, really. I was thinking, earlier today, I would redraw my FIRST from October of 2o12 to see how different it is =D
>> #10109
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Continuation of this =)
Considered doing parent post/child post, but I have no idea if this is a valid reason to. So ... I didn't. XD Lemme know if I should have though [the only reason I entertained it, was because this pic is a continuation of the link above.]
>> #10110
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10128
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10134
Score: 0 (vote Up)
One day soon, I won't be swamped with college work and will actually be able to sit down and think of what I want to commission from you. <.<
Also, parent/child applies here. Sequences with only two images are considered parent/child. But if a third image enters the sequence, it needs a pool.
>> #10141
Score: 0 (vote Up)
.... that I still need to sketch out >>
And Vandrill... I know! It's shocking, really. I was thinking, earlier today, I would redraw my FIRST from October of 2o12 to see how different it is =D