VG_Climp said: It's official boys. Corruption is not allowed on the hub for Star Wars. A sad day indeed.
I think the issue people are having here is this: For some people Sith = Corruption = Hypnosis For other people Sith =/= Corruption (I'm in the later came. Same reason I don't think Evil Rey belongs on the hub)
We really just need someone to say why star wars characters being corrupted specifically isn't good enough because this is getting old.
Corrupted ahsoka belongs here. The distinction is *corruption*. Just being a sith doesn't mean they're corrupted, like you wouldn't just post darth talon and expect it to be ok. But *good* characters like ahsoka and rey being turned evil is like, objectively corruption.
"A character is turned evil (usually accompanied by a costume change), or is otherwise made to think and act more in line with the desires of the evil being* that corrupted them."
I don't want to have more arguments about this stuff but goddamn I'm sick of it.
Timo4545 said: We really just need someone to say why star wars characters being corrupted specifically isn't good enough because this is getting old.
Corrupted ahsoka belongs here. The distinction is *corruption*. Just being a sith doesn't mean they're corrupted, like you wouldn't just post darth talon and expect it to be ok. But *good* characters like ahsoka and rey being turned evil is like, objectively corruption.
"A character is turned evil (usually accompanied by a costume change), or is otherwise made to think and act more in line with the desires of the evil being* that corrupted them."
I don't want to have more arguments about this stuff but goddamn I'm sick of it.
Timo4545 said: We really just need someone to say why star wars characters being corrupted specifically isn't good enough because this is getting old.
Corrupted ahsoka belongs here. The distinction is *corruption*. Just being a sith doesn't mean they're corrupted, like you wouldn't just post darth talon and expect it to be ok. But *good* characters like ahsoka and rey being turned evil is like, objectively corruption.
"A character is turned evil (usually accompanied by a costume change), or is otherwise made to think and act more in line with the desires of the evil being* that corrupted them."
I don't want to have more arguments about this stuff but goddamn I'm sick of it.
Me personally? It's because I don't see the Dark Side as corruption, and that's because I don't feel the Dark Side can *force* you to give into it, you have to make a choice. And if you're making the choice, is that really corruption?
...Though I guess it could count as Consensual Corruption then... which feels like an oxymoron, but that might just be me... You raise a good point, four thousand five hundred and forty-five birds...
Put my thoughts in spoiler because it is just my opinion, and it isn't necessarily right or even good.
I really don't want to argue over this point every single time either, so I'm just going to try and be clear with this:
1. Corrupted characters are completely fine so long as the focus is on the corruption itself. We've had this issue come up in the past where people kept posting Ladybug fanart of the villains. Yes, the characters were technically considered corrupted, but nothing about the art showed any kind of hypnosis or mind control. They just appeared to be generic evil bad guys, and in some cases, they were doing things that had absolutely nothing to do with corruption/MC. That's why we try to limit or avoid having posts that are of characters who appear corrupted, but the images themselves don't focus at all on the corruption (such as that one pic of Ashoka physically becoming "corrupted" just to have her enlarged breasts hold a cup). In this case, I removed the flag since the corruption itself is clear enough for us to see.
2. Same thing could be said for bimbofication/"pin up" posts. Usually we're fine with most of them, though some can be far more dubious than others with any actual MC on display (such as when somebody posted sexy pin up versions of pokemon and tagged them as bimbofication, which was totally a stretch).
I don't see how turning to the dark side is mind control/hypnosis. Unless it's a forced version like what happened to Ahsoka in the Clone Wars, which isn't the case for almost all Rey corruption images
>> #440610
Score: 1 (vote Up)
>> #440622
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It's official boys. Corruption is not allowed on the hub for Star Wars. A sad day indeed.
I think the issue people are having here is this:
For some people Sith = Corruption = Hypnosis
For other people Sith =/= Corruption (I'm in the later came. Same reason I don't think Evil Rey belongs on the hub)
>> #440625
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Corrupted ahsoka belongs here. The distinction is *corruption*. Just being a sith doesn't mean they're corrupted, like you wouldn't just post darth talon and expect it to be ok. But *good* characters like ahsoka and rey being turned evil is like, objectively corruption.
"A character is turned evil (usually accompanied by a costume change), or is otherwise made to think and act more in line with the desires of the evil being* that corrupted them."
I don't want to have more arguments about this stuff but goddamn I'm sick of it.
>> #440626
Score: 0 (vote Up)
We really just need someone to say why star wars characters being corrupted specifically isn't good enough because this is getting old.
Corrupted ahsoka belongs here. The distinction is *corruption*. Just being a sith doesn't mean they're corrupted, like you wouldn't just post darth talon and expect it to be ok. But *good* characters like ahsoka and rey being turned evil is like, objectively corruption.
"A character is turned evil (usually accompanied by a costume change), or is otherwise made to think and act more in line with the desires of the evil being* that corrupted them."
I don't want to have more arguments about this stuff but goddamn I'm sick of it.
I feel ya man.
>> #440627
Score: 0 (vote Up)
We really just need someone to say why star wars characters being corrupted specifically isn't good enough because this is getting old.
Corrupted ahsoka belongs here. The distinction is *corruption*. Just being a sith doesn't mean they're corrupted, like you wouldn't just post darth talon and expect it to be ok. But *good* characters like ahsoka and rey being turned evil is like, objectively corruption.
"A character is turned evil (usually accompanied by a costume change), or is otherwise made to think and act more in line with the desires of the evil being* that corrupted them."
I don't want to have more arguments about this stuff but goddamn I'm sick of it.
Me personally? It's because I don't see the Dark Side as corruption, and that's because I don't feel the Dark Side can *force* you to give into it, you have to make a choice. And if you're making the choice, is that really corruption?
...Though I guess it could count as Consensual Corruption then... which feels like an oxymoron, but that might just be me... You raise a good point, four thousand five hundred and forty-five birds...
Put my thoughts in spoiler because it is just my opinion, and it isn't necessarily right or even good.
>> #440631
Score: 0 (vote Up)
1. Corrupted characters are completely fine so long as the focus is on the corruption itself. We've had this issue come up in the past where people kept posting Ladybug fanart of the villains. Yes, the characters were technically considered corrupted, but nothing about the art showed any kind of hypnosis or mind control. They just appeared to be generic evil bad guys, and in some cases, they were doing things that had absolutely nothing to do with corruption/MC. That's why we try to limit or avoid having posts that are of characters who appear corrupted, but the images themselves don't focus at all on the corruption (such as that one pic of Ashoka physically becoming "corrupted" just to have her enlarged breasts hold a cup).
In this case, I removed the flag since the corruption itself is clear enough for us to see.
2. Same thing could be said for bimbofication/"pin up" posts. Usually we're fine with most of them, though some can be far more dubious than others with any actual MC on display (such as when somebody posted sexy pin up versions of pokemon and tagged them as bimbofication, which was totally a stretch).
>> #440737
Score: 0 (vote Up)