Posted on 2022-01-28 01:01:37
Score: 1 (vote Up)

I dunno, I think the programmer is doing an excellent job

Posted on 2022-01-28 01:39:51
Score: 0 (vote Up)

She didn't crashed yet, so sure the code is pretty good~

Posted on 2022-01-28 03:13:41
Score: 1 (vote Up)

Mmmmmm~~~ Endless Orgasming Robot hehe~

Posted on 2022-01-28 03:23:15
Score: 1 (vote Up)

That return statement is not necessary

Posted on 2022-01-28 08:52:00
Score: 2 (vote Up)

For one: yes it is, unless you make the return type VOID instead of INT. For two: that loop would actually not run at all, because the condition of i being >= 1 is satisfied as soon as it's initialized.

Yes, I've ruined this perfectly good piece of lewd; you're welcome!

Posted on 2022-01-28 14:47:38
Score: 2 (vote Up)

for loops run as long as the condition is true, so it will run until the integer overflow.

Posted on 2022-01-29 07:13:59
Score: 2 (vote Up)

It should just be a while(true)

Posted on 2022-01-31 17:10:34
Score: 1 (vote Up)

yes excactly

Posted on 2022-08-01 00:38:07
Score: 3 (vote Up)

That could just be written as

Int I;

I = 1
While (i =1)
{
Cum()
}

Posted on 2022-08-01 00:38:47
Score: 2 (vote Up)

That could just be written as

Int I;

I = 1;
While (i =1)
{
Cum();
}