Search

(Supports wildcard *)
Statistics
  • Id: 18178
  • Posted: 2014-07-20 23:20:14
    by greasyi
  • Size: 640x684
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 231 (vote up)
Options
History
Related Posts
black_hair blonde_hair blush breasts brown_eyes caption caption_only cleavage closed_eyes drool femsub french_kiss group_sex incest kissing large_breasts long_hair maledom manip multiple_girls sex short_hair sisters smile text threesome vaginal wildfire_(manipper)

Edit | Respond

5 comments (0 hidden)

scp-682
>> #23332
Posted on 2014-07-21 08:42:23
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Damn you mosaic censoring!!
greasyi
>> #23334
Posted on 2014-07-21 08:43:20
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Never bothered me, I don't get it. The goods are all in the black box at the bottom of the image, bro.
XfunX
>> #23426
Posted on 2014-07-22 21:44:42
Score: 0 (vote Up)
i really don't get censoring like what do they think that we think is underneath it is it a phone?, or a newspaper? or...
Vanndril
>> #23474
Posted on 2014-07-23 10:09:33
Score: 0 (vote Up)
XfunX said:
i really don't get censoring like what do they think that we think is underneath it is it a phone?, or a newspaper? or...


I tried to come up with a witty explanation, but drew a blank. You're right, aside from "it's a law in Japan", there really is no logic behind it, huh? Can't be "protecting" the children. I mean, if it is an attempt to do so, than it fails before it begins, because this is porn. It seems to be "just because our society deems it unacceptable to have showing". Because, you know, censored porn is obviously used for far less nefarious purposes than uncensored porn.
crazyman
>> #70539
Posted on 2015-09-15 05:55:59
Score: 0 (vote Up)
XfunX said:
i really don't get censoring like what do they think that we think is underneath it is it a phone?, or a newspaper? or...


Its for suspension of disbelief. So they can say "well its not 100% that..."
1