Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? star trek 63
- ? star wars 703
Character
- ? ash (svettak92) 16
- ? svetta (svettak92) 136
Artist
- ? polmanning 1146
General
- ? abs 2625
- ? accidental hypnosis 1177
- ? blonde hair 33080
- ? breasts 103612
- ? crop top 770
- ? dark skin 8682
- ? dazed 12601
- ? earrings 8953
- ? female only 57041
- ? femdom 30139
- ? femsub 132271
- ? glasses 10136
- ? green eyes 9359
- ? humor 2843
- ? jeans 1290
- ? midriff 5676
- ? mommy 240
- ? nerd 113
- ? open mouth 47017
- ? red hair 15649
- ? shrunken irises 1946
- ? sidecut 83
- ? single hair bun 232
- ? tongue 19097
- ? trigger 2128
Meta
- ? comic 28076
- ? dialogue 22462
- ? text 82457
Statistics
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #523611
Score: 2 (vote Up)
>> #523615
Score: 7 (vote Up)
>> #523622
Score: 4 (vote Up)
>> #523623
Score: 2 (vote Up)
>> #523629
Score: 3 (vote Up)
>> #523630
Score: 1 (vote Up)
>> #523631
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #523650
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #523659
Score: 4 (vote Up)
I didn't know "being terminally online" was the result of an SCP thing
>> #523662
Score: 0 (vote Up)
That depends, is Svetta the SCP, or is it the speech itself? Because if it's just Svetta, then I'd assume Safe, since I doubt she'd be hard to contain. But if it's the whole speech that continuously gets passed from person to person upon hearing it, then there's no way of knowing how many people out there have already heard the speech and become "carriers". In which case, Keter. Unless you wanna demote it to Euclid just because it doesn't seem too dangerous.