Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? sailor moon (series) 1337
Character
- ? sailor mercury 534
Artist
- ? arioncanvas 1
- ? vanndril (manipper) 192
General
- ? blue eyes 17238
- ? blue hair 13154
- ? blush 36749
- ? bottomless 40860
- ? breasts 103560
- ? chains 1218
- ? collar 13652
- ? dog pose 1056
- ? earrings 8951
- ? empty eyes 36287
- ? exhibitionism 1431
- ? femsub 132202
- ? happy trance 46676
- ? jewelry 9663
- ? large breasts 58347
- ? leash 1917
- ? nipples 16159
- ? nude 38585
- ? open clothes 5897
- ? pet play 4738
- ? short hair 40993
- ? squatting 3027
- ? tongue 19089
- ? tongue out 18330
- ? topless 44561
Meta
- ? manip 16629
Statistics
- Id: 18425
-
Posted: 2014-08-04 08:32:04
by Vanndril - Size: 1024x768
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=45048156
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 145 (vote up)
>> #24440
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Those eyes were harder to manip than they looked...
>> #24451
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #24454
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Wait what happened to the original O_O
RIP
Rest In Pixiv
>> #24456
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Wait what happened to the original O_O
It wasn't (turtley) MC enough for the (turtle) MC club.
>> #24473
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It wasn't (turtley) MC enough for the (turtle) MC club.
Really, I thought it fit right in. True she still had light in her eyes, but she was still acting like a dog while also being nude. somethings Ami is never really known to do.
>> #24476
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Really, I thought it fit right in. True she still had light in her eyes, but she was still acting like a dog while also being nude. somethings Ami is never really known to do.
the problem with that is, most known characters don't have sex either; would you think it was MC if she was kissing another girl, or wearing punk clothes? Porn makes 'what a character would do' unreliable
I still feel the original had MC elements, tho
>> #24488
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Porn makes 'what a character would do' unreliable
This. In hentai, even the strictest and straightest of characters become horny bisexual mega-sluts who are into really kinky things without even an ounce of MC. You really just can't go by that.
I still feel the original had MC elements, tho
Possibly. I wouldn't have it in my MC folders, personally, and I'm usually fairly lax about the requirements of an image being considered MC, as I have images there that aren't MC enough for the site because they look or feel MC to me. The potential MC elements of the original image were all far too subtle. It would be very hard to defend disallowing almost any image if that one were to have stayed in its unmanipped form.
In any case, unless you loved the eyes in the original (which I wouldn't blame you if you do, as they were gorgeously done), you all lost nothing in having me manip it to keep it up. I think it was a good solution. :P
>> #24495
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #24498
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I didn't know you could remove one pic and put in another in its place, tags and score transferred to the new
You can. In fact, anybody (who can delete an image - say, the uploader) can, it's not just the admins. ;)
You just need to make the NEW pic the parent of the OLD pic. Then, when you delete the OLD pic, the parent (new) pic will receive everything that is transferred.
>> #24527
Score: 0 (vote Up)
You can. In fact, anybody (who can delete an image - say, the uploader) can, it's not just the admins. ;)
You just need to make the NEW pic the parent of the OLD pic. Then, when you delete the OLD pic, the parent (new) pic will receive everything that is transferred.
Niiiice
& manipulating the eyes was a good solution to both cutting off the pointless argument & keeping the picture, but a part of me is frustrated with the dichotomous standard & bureaucratic thinking it represents