Search

(Supports wildcard *)
Statistics
Options
History
Related Posts
ai_art artist_request brown_hair clothed femsub hypnotic_eyes jungle my_hero_academia ochaco_uraraka ring_eyes short_hair smile snake

Edit | Respond

4 comments (0 hidden)

Mindwipe
>> #526924
Posted on 2023-11-24 02:40:08
Score: 3 (vote Up)
I'll let this one stay up, but I seriously don't get why people keep uploading this guy's AI generated pictures. He posts like 25 of them a day to his Deviant Art account and is probably one of the best examples of why AI art should probably fall under "mass-generated images."
Zzzzzulu
>> #526926
Posted on 2023-11-24 02:59:33
Score: 6 (vote Up)
In my defense:
A: He has a deviantart? Only found randomly via Twitter feed.
B: I'm a simple person. I see hypnosis art, I attempt to share hypnosis art (assuming you can (DNP, already shared, etc)). Sure, AI art has been a mass thing lately (and a good portion is def mass generated..., I find some interest in others though, hence these ones).
Mindwipe
>> #526933
Posted on 2023-11-24 05:05:19
Score: 6 (vote Up)
My mistake, this actually isn't from the same person I was thinking of. You'll have to forgive me, because it looks exactly like everything that person uploads on DA, probably because it was made with the exact same software with the same prompts.

Every day I get a little bit closer to treating AI art the same way as Kisekae. As in: unless you took the time to edit some stuff to make it look unique (like Qiller), I'm just gonna hit delete and not even think about it.
PornAcct
>> #527020
Posted on 2023-11-24 22:41:16
Score: 1 (vote Up)
I was under the impression that that guideline (the one Mindwipe mentioned around Kisekae) was already used for AI art? It really, really should be.
1