Posted on 2014-09-22 01:28:15
Score: 0 (vote Up)

doors54 needs to chill out

Posted on 2014-09-22 05:13:13
Score: 0 (vote Up)

He qualifies for an IP-ban

Posted on 2014-09-22 08:55:37
Score: 0 (vote Up)

For what? Flagging images for deletion? That would be a silly reason to punish someone. Or did he do something that I missed? I saw nothing worthy of a punishment let alone a banning.

Posted on 2014-09-22 09:10:45
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Me thinking two gradient dots added on images isn't good quality is worth banning me off the site? Really?

Posted on 2014-09-22 13:25:19
Score: 0 (vote Up)

I feel like I missed something - was there inflammatory language? Personal insults? Obnoxious behavior?

flagging something doesn't mean something WILL get deleted - but lets be honest, this is not exactly a great sample of mc art. I find stuff that fits the parameters [ie, try to avoid banned artists, has clear mc, etc] and I throw it up onto the board - if it sticks, great, and if it doesn't, it's no big thing

Posted on 2014-09-22 13:58:30
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Sorry , you didn't write anything to your delete request so I thought you were just a random just-now-registered who wants to troll and I wanted to scare away! No harm meant! ^^'

Posted on 2014-09-22 16:05:19
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Door54, glowing eyes is an actual accepted mind control visual aid. With it's own tag that has over a thousand images. And also, if you actually look at the picture, glow follows the shape of the eyes. The eye that is not fully visible for instance is radiating outward into the air but is cut off by her nose.

This specific piece is certainly not an example of two gradient dots being tossed haphazardly over the eyes.

Posted on 2014-09-22 16:17:05
Score: 0 (vote Up)

This stuff is ass and low-effort as fucking anything but whatever, apparently we allow it. Just add "celebhypnosis_(manipper)" on a new line to your blacklist.

Posted on 2014-09-23 02:30:01
Score: 0 (vote Up)

And yet it still takes more effort than 90% of the manips on the internet. :P

We don't have QC policies in order to be picky, we have them to save us from things like <<fc01.deviantart.net/fs70/...by_jomama7154-d665hdu.png|this>>.

Just saying.

Posted on 2014-09-23 02:35:23
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Hey, don't post my masterpieces without my permission :P

I think I can agree with Doors that they're not prime quality, but unfortunately we have precedence of the "empty_eyes" situation. Which is why we have a thread (courtesy of Takyon iirc) dedicated to a specific blacklist set to prevent empty_eyes only pictures. Still, I can see where they are coming from, at least wanting them checked over.