Search
(Supports wildcard *)Artist
- ? hypnosisisgreat (manipper) 151
- ? sleepy gimp 64
- ? stable diffusion (ai) 438
General
- ? bare legs 3588
- ? barefoot 11976
- ? betrayal 201
- ? bottomless 40791
- ? breasts 103253
- ? brown hair 29264
- ? cum on body 4007
- ? feet 8970
- ? femdom 30057
- ? financial domination 219
- ? footjob 397
- ? gloves 14576
- ? huge breasts 22225
- ? large breasts 58281
- ? legs 3647
- ? malesub 13897
- ? multiple boys 1985
- ? multiple subs 9547
- ? nail polish 2126
- ? nude 38467
- ? pendulum 11766
- ? penis 26661
- ? topless 44495
Meta
- ? ai art 2171
- ? dialogue 22333
- ? text 82236
Statistics
- Id: 199861
-
Posted: 2024-03-28 03:45:40
by HypnosisIsGreat - Size: 1280x800
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 62 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #539314
Score: 1 (vote Up)
>> #539324
Score: 2 (vote Up)
>> #539330
Score: 7 (vote Up)
>> #539341
Score: 2 (vote Up)
(And I don't see why people are complaining about AI. The uploader tagged it as 'ai art' so those who don't want to see it can just do a negative search. And the original art piece was also credited. Not like they tried to pass it off as their own creation)
>> #539343
Score: 4 (vote Up)
I actually don't like the term "ai art" because in my opinion the technical ability to fill in the same details that thousands of others have done before is not the artistic part. It's the composition which is still entirely Sleepy Gimp in this case.
There is a 0% chance that with prompting alone you could get even the most advanced generative models to create something close to this. And things like nuanced facial expressions require an actual artist's touch. Comparing this to the original is an excellent example since Sleepy Gimp's faces carry a personality with them and this image loses that.