Search

(Supports wildcard *)
Statistics
Options
History
Related Posts
bottomless breasts brown_hair dog_girl female_only femsub furry happy_trance kaity_(kaitycuddle) kaitycuddle long_hair nipples nude open_mouth pendulum pocket_watch red_hair sitting sketch solo spiral spiral_eyes spread_legs symbol_in_eyes tongue tongue_out topless traditional

Edit | Respond

9 comments (0 hidden)

MrGerp
>> #44110
Posted on 2015-01-28 19:50:06
Score: 0 (vote Up)
greasyi
>> #44111
Posted on 2015-01-28 20:02:37
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Flagged that one for deletion already. I can't find a better source for this one (it came off the furry booru) and I have no idea why there's two versions, but I figure less cropped is always better than more cropped.
MrGerp
>> #44113
Posted on 2015-01-28 20:21:25
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I dunno, seems kind of pointless to repost it to show a bit more of her foot.
greasyi
>> #44124
Posted on 2015-01-28 23:40:31
Score: 0 (vote Up)
OR, is it pointless to FIRST... to FIRSTPOST it... to show a bit LESS of her foot? Eh? Eh??
MrGerp
>> #44127
Posted on 2015-01-29 00:26:45
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I was just following the one I found on her page. Not sure why there's an lesser cropped version on furry booru and not on the artist's page. I still find it frivolous to replace something to show slightly more of a foot.
PomPom
>> #44128
Posted on 2015-01-29 00:42:41
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Per our rules (and the general flow of things), if there's a larger version or better crop of an image, we upload it. It does seem a little silly that there were two versions in the first place (did someone commission it and the artist only posted a cropped down version to their own page?)
Dantus
>> #44139
Posted on 2015-01-29 03:02:14
Score: 0 (vote Up)
PomPom said:
Per our rules (and the general flow of things), if there's a larger version or better crop of an image, we upload it. It does seem a little silly that there were two versions in the first place (did someone commission it and the artist only posted a cropped down version to their own page?)

Artists do stuff like that quite often for no apparent reason. Sometimes I really have to wonder why some artists put insane effort into a pic with tons of detail... only to upload it at ~600x400 res.
Zko
>> #44140
Posted on 2015-01-29 03:05:53
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Dantus said:
Artists do stuff like that quite often for no apparent reason. Sometimes I really have to wonder why some artists put insane effort into a pic with tons of detail... only to upload it at ~600x400 res.


I think the reasoning behind that is if its a commission they want to keep it average resolution just to show it off but give the high res file to the commissioner since they were the ones who bought it.
greasyi
>> #44289
Posted on 2015-01-30 21:50:45
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Or they decided the foot looked ugly and replaced the FA image with a cropped one.
1