Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? original 42965
Artist
- ? hioshiru 3
General
- ? black hair 30183
- ? blush 36719
- ? bottomless 40812
- ? breasts 103325
- ? cat girl 4020
- ? dog girl 1574
- ? female only 56958
- ? femdom 30100
- ? femsub 132048
- ? furry 17866
- ? large breasts 58318
- ? lying 2086
- ? non-human feet 2941
- ? nude 38553
- ? paws 591
- ? pendulum 11775
- ? sabre tooth tiger girl 2
- ? smile 28662
- ? tiger girl 248
- ? topless 44509
- ? white hair 8174
- ? wings 3595
- ? wolf girl 843
- ? yuri 6332
Statistics
- Id: 27475
-
Posted: 2015-07-11 00:06:47
by Dantus - Size: 1300x1007
- Source: www.furaffinity.net/view/15835916/
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 70 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #62939
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #62940
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I-is that Big Hero 6?
Seems like it ^^.
>> #62941
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #62945
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Well now all I can think of is <<www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYznTduWofo|this>>. #90'sKids
>> #63034
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #63035
Score: 0 (vote Up)
How does this merit the consensual tag? Is it in the source?
Why do we have a consensual tag when we've always used a pool for that?
>> #63038
Score: 0 (vote Up)
How does this merit the consensual tag? Is it in the source?
Just checked the FA. Going by the title and tags, I'm not even sure it's actually MC, let alone consensual MC. I think the characters are just playing with a cat toy.
Why do we have a consensual tag when we've always used a pool for that?
Why would you use a pool for that? Wouldn't a tag make more sense?
>> #63088
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Why would you use a pool for that? Wouldn't a tag make more sense?
No, because being consensual is something that is either drawn from context, "feel", or 3rd-party knowledge, none of which make for a very objective tag. I'm removing all instances of the tag, since pretty much every pic tagged with it is already in the pool.
>> #64970
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Just checked the FA. Going by the title and tags, I'm not even sure it's actually MC, let alone consensual MC. I think the characters are just playing with a cat toy.
This a gentle reminder that different people see the fetish of hypnosis differently, so we should all try not to be too judgemental. (Sorry for answering so long after it was posted!) I've seen people hypnotized on this site with a LOT of objects - why not a cat toy? Consider that it might have been the closest thing to hand, or the thing that would most catch the attention of the target.
>> #65015
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This a gentle reminder that different people see the fetish of hypnosis differently, so we should all try not to be too judgemental. (Sorry for answering so long after it was posted!) I've seen people hypnotized on this site with a LOT of objects - why not a cat toy? Consider that it might have been the closest thing to hand, or the thing that would most catch the attention of the target.
The problem isn't so much an issue of what the sub is being hypnotized by, but a lack of visual evidence that they are actually being hypnotized at all. Because Hypnohub is a primarily visual site, we have to filter what goes into our gallery based on relevance to our fetish, and, according to the site guidelines, that means we need to have some kind of indication that one or more parties in the image are explicitly being hypnotized. We have many ways of doing this, but most common is some alteration to the sub's expression or eye color/shape to make the effect obvious.