Wienerman said: Not that this picture isn't sexy, but the device on her chest kind of detracts from it all. Couldn't it have been on her forehead or something?
I quite like the device, it gives her a kind of robotic look
Wienerman said: Not that this picture isn't sexy, but the device on her chest kind of detracts from it all. Couldn't it have been on her forehead or something?
It's on her chest because it is mased on the device that is on Jill valentine.
>> #66761
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #66772
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #66773
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I said what it was on the parent post
OH I wondered where my question went XD sorry
>> #66802
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #66822
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Not that this picture isn't sexy, but the device on her chest kind of detracts from it all. Couldn't it have been on her forehead or something?
I quite like the device, it gives her a kind of robotic look
>> #66827
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I quite like the device, it gives her a kind of robotic look
even so, I concur with Wienerman. I think it would look better on her forehead.
speaking of which, Mr. Wienerman, your handle wouldn't happen to be based on Howard Wienerman from "Randy Cunningham, 9th Grade Ninja"?
>> #66841
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Not that this picture isn't sexy, but the device on her chest kind of detracts from it all. Couldn't it have been on her forehead or something?
It's on her chest because it is mased on the device that is on Jill valentine.