Search

(Supports wildcard *)
Statistics
Options
History
Related Posts
arle bikini_armor brown_eyes brown_hair dazed female_only femsub open_mouth professor-celestino_(manipper) puyo_puyo ramaz191 smile staff symbol_in_eyes

Edit | Respond

11 comments (0 hidden)

Cowsinner
>> #102933
Posted on 2016-05-09 03:40:06
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Cute. And for some reason.....reminiscent....

Also, it totally makes me think of the Good Dinosaur. Awesomely realistic background, cartoony characters.... ^_^
Vanndril
>> #102958
Posted on 2016-05-09 06:09:51
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Oh, this one is gonna be fun to bring to the QCC. I've seen a lot of art involving drawn characters on real backgrounds, or characters and backgrounds with mismatching "reality", in the past. It's a sort of artistic form, and it's very hit or miss.

I wonder how the QCC will react.

I'll be forwarding it to them.
HypnoMangaEditor
>> #103011
Posted on 2016-05-09 12:33:49
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't think this even needs our call. Real manips are forbidden and the rules do not clearly state which part of the manip needs to be the real one or if it is a mixup or not. As far as I am concerned, the QCC does not need to vote on borderline rule issues because it isn't related to Quality. It's an admin decision.
Werewolf
>> #103051
Posted on 2016-05-09 21:20:27
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I dunno, I kinda dig the spatial contrast, it's artsy.
Vanndril
>> #103231
Posted on 2016-05-10 23:42:40
Score: 0 (vote Up)
HypnoMangaEditor said:
I don't think this even needs our call. Real manips are forbidden and the rules do not clearly state which part of the manip needs to be the real one or if it is a mixup or not. As far as I am concerned, the QCC does not need to vote on borderline rule issues because it isn't related to Quality. It's an admin decision.


Huh. Good point.

Is this considered a real manip, or a drawn manip? o.O

Hm...

I'll have to think on this. But in the meantime, I'd like the QCC to vote on the matter regardless, in case we decide it doesn't break that rule.
Professor-Celestino
>> #103376
Posted on 2016-05-11 17:35:02
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>the cartoonish artstyle in contrast with the real photo
Ehh, guess it's not your style.

>and even worse what the FUCK are those eyes?
fuck off
Pinkanator
>> #103377
Posted on 2016-05-11 18:24:27
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Professor-Celestino said:
>the cartoonish artstyle in contrast with the real photo
Ehh, guess it's not your style.

>and even worse what the FUCK are those eyes?
fuck off


*Opens fold-out chair*
*Grabs popcorn*
rain
>> #103379
Posted on 2016-05-11 18:46:28
Score: 0 (vote Up)
RE: the real life issue, I'd thought the reason for the rule was the issue of manipping people who probably hadn't consented to it; scenery wouldn't raise any issues of that sort, would it?
Mindwipe
>> #103398
Posted on 2016-05-11 23:01:30
Score: 0 (vote Up)
The "no real life manips" rule was never meant to apply to backgrounds. The two main reasons for it were the difficulty of judging quality and what rain said. Neither of which pose a major problem if it's just a background.
HypnoMangaEditor
>> #103428
Posted on 2016-05-12 01:14:46
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Well, if that is the case then the image should remain. No need to vote, because there is literally nothing wrong with quality in this one.

The only reason this was brought up was the background - that's not what the QCC should decide on. I can understand why the first idea was to bring it to a vote - it was good intention, but I think this is a case where we push the question of if it is fine to use real backgrounds in a manip (which has been done in anime for ages) to a quality based decision - which it is not. The QCC is neither here to uphold the rules of pictures, nor to limit artists creativity - we are here to provide a very basic quality control.

Don't get me wrong - I am not against voting for it, but there is no point to do it.
1 2 > >>