Search

(Supports wildcard *)
Statistics
Options
History
Related Posts
animals_only blush censored drool evil_smile femdom heart heart_eyes hypnotic_gas litten malesub nintendo open_mouth penis pheromones pokemon pokemon_(creature) pokephilia roegakan salandit smile symbol_in_eyes text translated

Edit | Respond

9 comments (0 hidden)

Dantus
>> #140969
Posted on 2016-11-30 12:46:38
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Aaaand here we go, our first Salandit/Salazzle hentai doujinji. This is what we all have been waiting for.
pineapple
>> #140976
Posted on 2016-11-30 14:24:34
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Don't forget the furry tag.

>> #140993
Posted on 2016-11-30 16:42:02
Score: 0 (vote Up)
pineapple said:
Don't forget the furry tag.


Nope, not furry, "animals_only"
WhatIsLove
>> #141066
Posted on 2016-12-01 00:08:19
Score: 0 (vote Up)
<b>funnyman</b> said:
Nope, not furry, "animals_only"


That's still furry. Tag it properly please. I don't want to see this crap.
plsignore
>> #141082
Posted on 2016-12-01 01:01:55
Score: 0 (vote Up)
WhatIsLove said:
That's still furry. Tag it properly please. I don't want to see this crap.



Then blacklist animals_only as well, then, god. The <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=animals_only | wiki>> is pretty clear that the two tags are more or less mutually exclusive
akaece
>> #141094
Posted on 2016-12-01 02:02:38
Score: 0 (vote Up)
plsignore said:
Then blacklist animals_only as well, then, god. The <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=animals_only | wiki>> is pretty clear that the two tags are more or less mutually exclusive


This is unfortunately the case. It was a bad decision by the mods, I think, given that none of the mods like(d) furry stuff (at the time) or understand what appeals to who outside of humans, but that's the way it's used.
Mindwipe
>> #141095
Posted on 2016-12-01 02:05:22
Score: 0 (vote Up)
akaece said:
This is unfortunately the case. It was a bad decision by the mods, I think, given that none of the mods like(d) furry stuff (at the time) or understand what appeals to who outside of humans, but that's the way it's used.


Umm... I'm pretty sure I was a mod at the time. And I was in full support of that tag specifically BECAUSE I was okay with furry (as in anthros), but was not a fan of all-fours, normal animals.
Dantus
>> #141225
Posted on 2016-12-01 16:21:31
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Thanks for the translation, changed the Pool name to the correct one ;-)!
VivianK
>> #141329
Posted on 2016-12-02 07:11:46
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Huh, didn't realize those two tags were separate - come to think of it, this is the first time in a while after blacklisting "furry" (no offense to people into that stuff, but it feels like the amount of furry to non-furry content is 5:1, and very little of it appeals to me) that I've seen anything involving animals, which I think means a lot of things with animals - whether it's "animals_only" or not - is getting tagged improperly as "furry". That or no tag exists specifically for animals in the image but not necessarily animals only.

On a more image related note: is it a Salandit or Salazzle? Because a Salandit wouldn't be that much larger than a Litten.
1