Search

(Supports wildcard *)
Statistics
Options
History
Related Posts
balls blush bottomless breasts cum cum_in_pussy dog_girl drool femsub from_behind furry happy_trance heart heart_eyes hypno lactation large_breasts lucario magic maledom manip nintendo nude open_mouth pendulum penis phantom_penis pineapple_(manipper) pokemon pokemon_(creature) pokephilia pussy pussy_juice sex simple_background smile snowertheleopard_(colorist) spread_legs sweat symbol_in_eyes tailzkim text topless trembling vaginal

Edit | Respond

7 comments (0 hidden)

GrandDad
>> #145336
Posted on 2016-12-20 19:46:35
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ZeldaIsHot said:
Real talk, can we imagine for a second that Pokemon did have genitalia (or at least, visible genitalia) especially in the case of the more humanoid Pokemon, wouldn't that raise some concern? For a few reasons, namely the fact that having a nude Lucario, like the one presented above, walking around a city behind a trainer may be a bit of an issue. Perhaps they'd fashion clothes for Pokemon for that reason? Not sure. Just seems a bit off when Pokemon are depicted like this.


Furries have been around for exactly 1,500 years so asking that question at this point is kind of pointless.



Also, love the fact that the balls were recolored to a more hypno-y color. Just a great touch, some good polish right there.
GrandDad
>> #145340
Posted on 2016-12-20 20:11:02
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ZeldaIsHot said:
Even if furries have been, Pokemon hasn't.

And even then, I assume most furries wouldn't have sex with an actual animal.


But your point still revolves around treating Pokemon like real animals, and then said animals taking the form of an anthropomorphized depiction, which is like me asking if my dog having a big dang human dongle flopping around would be a problem, to which the answer should be immediately obvious.
pineapple
>> #145344
Posted on 2016-12-20 20:23:39
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ZeldaIsHot said:
Real talk, can we imagine for a second that Pokemon did have genitalia (or at least, visible genitalia) especially in the case of the more humanoid Pokemon, wouldn't that raise some concern? For a few reasons, namely the fact that having a nude Lucario, like the one presented above, walking around a city behind a trainer may be a bit of an issue. Perhaps they'd fashion clothes for Pokemon for that reason? Not sure. Just seems a bit off when Pokemon are depicted like this.


Furry porn is not realistic or logical by any stretch. Pokemon has a lot of humanoids with simple, easily replicated, and memorable designs. They're widely known, and can be extremely off-model and still instantly recognisable.

Fetish porn generally exists in its own compartmentalised bubble.
Cowsinner
>> #145415
Posted on 2016-12-21 02:49:57
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Im more concerned with giant spike growing out of her chest.....man....boob jobs require way too much sacrifice now...
thatpokemonman
>> #146698
Posted on 2016-12-28 09:29:07
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Cowsinner said:
Im more concerned with giant spike growing out of her chest.....man....boob jobs require way too much sacrifice now...


I'd much rather not think about that, thank you very much... *shudders in horror*

Though, in all honesty, if that were the case, many Pokemon would look kinda weird...
Imasuky
>> #146699
Posted on 2016-12-28 09:31:12
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Cowsinner said:
Im more concerned with giant spike growing out of her chest.....man....boob jobs require way too much sacrifice now...


I never considered that....Man I don't think it'd e worth it.
Anon_3.141
>> #146734
Posted on 2016-12-28 12:57:57
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ZeldaIsHot said:
Even if furries have been, Pokemon hasn't.

And even then, I assume most furries wouldn't have sex with an actual animal.


Porn is porn. It exists for its own sake, LOGIC BE DAMNED!

So just stop worrying, and fap/jill away.
1