Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? overwatch 1352
Character
- ? mei (overwatch) 156
- ? tracer 352
Artist
- ? deeezel 3
General
- ? bent over 1175
- ? blush 37263
- ? bodysuit 6807
- ? bottomless 41548
- ? breast press 1801
- ? breasts 105302
- ? brown hair 29811
- ? embarrassed 1250
- ? femsub 134346
- ? futa with female 839
- ? futadom 1886
- ? futanari 5426
- ? glasses 10279
- ? gloves 14956
- ? groping 4164
- ? hair ornament 4044
- ? huge breasts 22616
- ? lipstick 6322
- ? looking at viewer 12830
- ? looking back 1642
- ? makeup 3404
- ? multiple girls 15986
- ? nude 39506
- ? orange eyes 1787
- ? panties 8521
- ? penis 27332
- ? sex 18128
- ? short hair 41409
- ? sideboob 1144
- ? smile 29117
- ? sweat 11517
- ? thong 1970
- ? topless 45258
- ? underwear 11515
Statistics
- Id: 43533
-
Posted: 2017-01-02 20:08:15
by Zementblock - Size: 672x880
- Source: danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2360885
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 53 (vote up)
>> #147838
Score: 0 (vote Up)
What I'm confused about is "how". I mean that's a ridiculous amount of tags, most of which are unofficial and should be removed (done now), but that shouldn't be causing this to happen...
Also the thumbnail is still showing up so the flag shouldn't result in removal quite yet.
>> #147841
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Honestly, this...is extremely puzzling
>> #147845
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Knowing that, my best guess is that there was some kind of glitch due to the filename they uploaded having the hash already in it (danbooru.donmai.us/data/_...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png to 404'd hypnohub.net//data/image/...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png)
>> #147890
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #148168
Score: 0 (vote Up)
As I suspected, it's a copy from danbooru. danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2360885
Knowing that, my best guess is that there was some kind of glitch due to the filename they uploaded having the hash already in it (danbooru.donmai.us/data/_...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png to 404'd hypnohub.net//data/image/...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png)
That shouldn't be an issue. The software converts the image name to its MD5 hash. The hash already being part of the filename shouldn't get in the way of that. But who really knows, I guess.
It's not the first time a post was uploaded where the actual image file was never actually uploaded despite the thumbnail being successfully made. I'll have to keep an eye on the original filenames if I know the sources to see if it really is a naming issue.
I'll fix this manually.
Edit: Done.
_________________________________________
Now, more importantly, I'm not very familiar with the source. so... Can anyone explain how this is MC?