brown_hair caption caption_only female_only femsub humiliation manip masturbation mindtaker_(manipper) panties short_hair text underwear urination wet_clothes

6 comments (0 hidden)

Lady_Gardevoir
>> #188669
Posted on 2017-07-20 06:54:10
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Interesting, not seeing the hypnotist itself... but rather the effects of the mysterious entity... seems rather erotic actually

disgustinggirl
>> #188670
Posted on 2017-07-20 06:55:05
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Just so you know, I've always loved the omorashi-ladies stuff and I keep finding your story rather entertaining.

Mindtaker
>> #188682
Posted on 2017-07-20 07:50:09
Score: 0 (vote Up)
disgustinggirl said:
Just so you know, I've always loved the omorashi-ladies stuff and I keep finding your story rather entertaining.


Thanks! While I don't want to only upload pics from that site, or even necessarily this fetish, I was inspired to both write this story and finally make an account here by two particular pictures on the site (which ironically enough, I ended up not even using in favor of images/scenarios I like better), so I figure it's only fitting that I use them for this particular pool. Plus, it at least keeps the style consistent, though not necessarily the appearance of our poor mind controlled protagonist.

The_Laurent
>> #188726
Posted on 2017-07-20 16:57:46
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Though, I'm not actually necessarily seeing the age-Regression yet. I mean, is it coming and it's part of the sequence?

You might be saying, "But there's a girl wetting herself!" But that's not Age Regression, that's incontinence.

Just curious is all.

disgustinggirl
>> #188727
Posted on 2017-07-20 17:07:50
Score: 0 (vote Up)
that's not Age Regression, that's incontinence.


Which, incidentally, might be why I love it so much. <3

Mindtaker
>> #188732
Posted on 2017-07-20 17:49:13
Score: 0 (vote Up)
The_Laurent said:
Though, I'm not actually necessarily seeing the age-Regression yet. I mean, is it coming and it's part of the sequence?

You might be saying, "But there's a girl wetting herself!" But that's not Age Regression, that's incontinence.

Just curious is all.


My thought process behind the choice wasn't just that she was wetting herself, but why she was doing it. Sure, she might not be thinking like a younger child, but the mind manipulation that's going on with her is not allowing her to deal with this in a normal matter. She started with not being able to hold it in while she slept, then she was unable to bring herself to use a toilet, and now she's being forced to use a makeshift 'training potty' because she can't even go in a bathroom. Heck, technically she's not even incontinent, since she can hold it in, at least when she's awake. She's just 'forbidden' from going in the proper way, and at some point she can't keep holding it in. And of course, what she's 'forbidden' from doing keeps getting more elaborate in each part, thus furthering the 'regression' and pushing things towards an end goal which I'm not going to say yet, but you might be able to guess by now.

All that being said, you might have a point. It's not really 'age regression' so much as 'toilet training regression' thus far, and regardless of where future parts take it, that might not be enough to justify putting the tag in the current parts. An earlier version of this part left her unable to use a toilet at all (or even enter a bathroom entirely!), which would have forced her to start having to go #2 in her panties as well, which would have been the next 'step' rather than her beginning to unconsciously masturbate. That could have fit the regression theme better, but the way you put it even that could be considered stretching it.

Either way, you've given me something to mull over as I head to bed, and it's very possible that I might agree with you entirely by the time I wake up, in which case I'll remove the tags. Heck, it wouldn't be the first time I fundamentally misunderstood the meaning/intent of a tag on this site. I already had to go back earlier and remove the 'POV' and 'POV Sub' tags from the whole pool because I thought those tags meant that the post was showing things from the sub's point of view, rather than having the post be in a 2nd person perspective. And I still don't know what the hell 'shimi' is, even though someone added the tag to part two.

1