Search

(Supports wildcard *)
Statistics
Options
History
Related Posts
bottomless brown_hair cell_phone cum drool empty_eyes erection expressionless furry handsfree_ejaculation happy_trance hulder hypnotic_audio hypnotic_screen male_only maledom malesub non-human_feet nude open_mouth orgasm orgasm_command original otter_boy penis porcupine_boy sitting tech_control text tongue tongue_out topless trigger

Edit | Respond

9 comments (0 hidden)

DanGambino
>> #250545
Posted on 2018-05-08 01:15:19
Score: 0 (vote Up)
That's not artifacting. The artist put a grainy filter over the image. Quality is unchanged from source.
bugmenot
>> #250564
Posted on 2018-05-08 02:51:13
Score: 0 (vote Up)
DanGambino said:
That's not artifacting. The artist put a grainy filter over the image. Quality is unchanged from source.


Yes, the artist used a grain filter / dithering, but compare it to <<www.furaffinity.net/view/25986074/|the textless version>> and you'll see that resizing the graininess caused considerable jpeg artifacting.
DanGambino
>> #250625
Posted on 2018-05-08 05:58:05
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Negatory, my dude. It's just that in a smaller size, the grain filter is more noticeable.
Twelvetables
>> #250656
Posted on 2018-05-08 08:51:24
Score: 0 (vote Up)
DanGambino said:
That's not artifacting. The artist put a grainy filter over the image. Quality is unchanged from source.


This isn't the original source. It had to be compressed so it can be posted online. The original picture is over 20MB while this one is around 2MB. There is still a grainy filter on the original but it isn't as noticeable.
DanGambino
>> #250665
Posted on 2018-05-08 10:35:59
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Yeah, that's what happens when you make the image smaller. Same amount of grain. Smaller image. So it's more noticeable. Still not artifacting. That's just what happens when you shrink a grainy image.
bugmenot
>> #250674
Posted on 2018-05-08 13:15:55
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Grain or no, there's still a good bit of jpeg artifacting. It's especially easy to see around the edges of the text.
DanGambino
>> #250810
Posted on 2018-05-09 02:46:06
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Again. Exactly the same quality as source.
Twelvetables
>> #250889
Posted on 2018-05-09 08:56:12
Score: 0 (vote Up)
bugmenot said:
Grain or no, there's still a good bit of jpeg artifacting. It's especially easy to see around the edges of the text.

Don't worry you are correct. It's a picture I posted on Fur affinity. It was compressed to fit on their website.
bugmenot
>> #250893
Posted on 2018-05-09 09:00:29
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Twelvetables said:
Don't worry you are correct. It's a picture I posted on Fur affinity. It was compressed to fit on their website.



If you have the uncompressed version, could you please post it here?
1