Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? original 43053
Artist
- ? hypnokissed 10
General
- ? bell 293
- ? bell collar 863
- ? blush 36820
- ? bottomless 40916
- ? breasts 103797
- ? collar 13668
- ? drool 25145
- ? expressionless 20472
- ? female only 57199
- ? kneeling 7214
- ? large breasts 58384
- ? nude 38756
- ? open mouth 47075
- ? pussy 17923
- ? pussy juice 9884
- ? short hair 41028
- ? spiral 6551
- ? spiral eyes 23811
- ? sweat 11345
- ? symbol in eyes 32311
- ? topless 44629
- ? unhappy trance 1985
Meta
- ? text 82749
Statistics
- Id: 64101
-
Posted: 2018-05-12 08:58:11
by hypnokissed - Size: 1009x1158
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 87 (vote up)
>> #251466
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #251467
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #251468
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #251471
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #251473
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I think you messed up when saving this image. There's jpeg artifacting, but it's a png, which means that it was saved in low quality first, then edited and saved as a lossless image later.
I'm not sure I know what any of those words mean, but it was originally taken as a jpeg, then edited and saved as a png. Is that a problem?
>> #251482
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm not sure I know what any of those words mean, but it was originally taken as a jpeg, then edited and saved as a png. Is that a problem?
Basically what I was saying is that when you first saved it, it wasn't saved in very high quality, so you can see a whole bunch of compression artifacts. To avoid this, try to save your images in a lossless format (like png) the first time.
>> #251578
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm not sure I know what any of those words mean, but it was originally taken as a jpeg, then edited and saved as a png. Is that a problem?
This kinda sums up the basic differences between jpeg and png. img.labnol.org/di/jpg_vs_png.png