Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? disney 8249
- ? the incredibles 444
Character
- ? elastigirl 279
- ? helen parr 345
Artist
- ? nonesaint 3
General
- ? bodysuit 6698
- ? brown hair 29456
- ? femsub 132604
- ? goggles 524
- ? hypnotic accessory 7782
- ? hypnotic screen 2710
- ? milf 4588
- ? open mouth 47083
- ? short hair 41033
- ? spoilers 507
- ? super hero 6254
- ? tech control 23102
Meta
- ? absurdres 34567
- ? western 9310
Statistics
- Id: 65738
-
Posted: 2018-06-18 05:41:47
by bugmenot - Size: 2480x3507
- Source: nonesaintnsfw.tumblr.com/...ontrolled-in-incredible-2
- Rating: Safe
- Score: 107 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #265896
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #265901
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #265912
Score: 0 (vote Up)
So is this part of the movie?
More or less
>> #265913
Score: 0 (vote Up)
So is this part of the movie?
Oh, yes. It's not exactly the same, the expression and other details are different, but it's not much of a stretch ;)
>> #265918
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #265923
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #265934
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm torn on the spoiler tag, though. Without having already seen the scene where this happens, there's no way to know that this is a spoiler. There's barely 30 seconds between the reveal that these googles exist, and them being used on her. And a savvy watcher will know that's exactly what's going to happen as soon as the goggles show up.
Those obviously these comments are a huge spoiler. So maybe the tag is a good idea after all. lol
>> #265945
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #265964
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It didn’t work my friend.
Edit: How do you guys add in hyperlinks to text on the comment section here?