Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? rwby 1571
Character
- ? ruby rose 419
- ? weiss schnee 379
Artist
- ? iesupa 2
- ? litter (manipper) 15
General
- ? black hair 30125
- ? blue eyes 17171
- ? blush 36629
- ? clothed 6789
- ? consensual 1430
- ? dress 4570
- ? female only 56876
- ? ponytail 12267
- ? short hair 40957
- ? side ponytail 1082
- ? smile 28624
- ? white hair 8155
- ? wholesome 583
- ? yuri 6320
Meta
- ? absurdres 34454
- ? caption 8906
- ? manip 16632
- ? text 82235
Statistics
- Id: 65913
-
Posted: 2018-06-22 23:32:36
by Litter - Size: 5000x1925
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=50297922
- Rating: Safe
- Score: 35 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #266686
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I hope you like reading.
>> #266798
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #266819
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Are they underage?
No they are teenagers
>> #266865
Score: 0 (vote Up)
(also, unrelated note: the "underage" tag is covered in scope by "loli" and "shota" and thus redundant. I removed that a while ago.)
Ruby and Weiss are "of age", but the characters in this image sure as heck don't *look* like them.
>> #267284
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Are they underage?
Even if they are underage, posts of illustrated characters do not warrant for a flag.
If they were underage images of real children or teens, that would be a completely different issue.
>> #267473
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #343695
Score: 0 (vote Up)
No they are teenagers
*facepalm* That's like saying "No, grapes aren't fruit, they're berries." IDK why Chrislangster even asked when they're so obviously kids.