Search

(Supports wildcard *)
Statistics
Options
History
Related Posts
animals_only barefoot black_skin bottomless feet foot_focus male_only maledom nintendo nude pheromones pokemon pokemon_(creature) pokephilia purple_eyes salandit shinxiolu slit_pupils smile topless

Edit | Respond

6 comments (0 hidden)

supersmasher2020
>> #282809
Posted on 2018-10-01 04:53:42
Score: 0 (vote Up)
...Amazing effort on those tags.
(For those in the future when the tags are fixed, the current tags are as follows:

salazzle
pheremones

That's it.)

Edit: and now that one of them has been proven wrong it's even worse.
supersmasher2020
>> #282812
Posted on 2018-10-01 04:57:42
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Not sure if nude applies, since no genitalia are shown. Adding it anyway. Also not sure on dom or sub (are those her pheromones or someone else's). Added hairless tag, but that is apparently a new tag, so not sure if that should stay as well.
Argonis
>> #282813
Posted on 2018-10-01 04:58:29
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I can't tell if i'm suppose to me smelling her feet or licking them
by the looks of this pic.
hypnojason989
>> #282815
Posted on 2018-10-01 05:03:03
Score: 0 (vote Up)
From this angle it looks more like a salandid then salazzal
supersmasher2020
>> #282816
Posted on 2018-10-01 05:05:07
Score: 0 (vote Up)
hypnojason989 said:
From this angle it looks more like a salandid then salazzal


Based on the fact that there were only two tags on this image to begin with, I wouldn't be surprised if you were right on that error in tagging. Then again, Salazzal was one of the two, so who knows.
Ultilix
>> #282825
Posted on 2018-10-01 07:14:23
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This is absolutely a Salandit and not a Salazzle, the design differences are quite obvious considering Salazzle has no light-gray on her body and instead has purple with red decals on her stomach. Plus, the source has it tagged as a Salandit too, so I changed the tag on here to fix that.
1