Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? original 42978
Character
- ? crystal (zko) 379
Artist
- ? zko 395
General
- ? ambiguous pov 115
- ? blue eyes 17230
- ? blush 36741
- ? breasts 103367
- ? cleavage 22934
- ? female only 56984
- ? femsub 132168
- ? humor 2840
- ? large breasts 58338
- ? masturbation 5322
- ? open mouth 46986
- ? orgasm denial 203
- ? pink hair 10433
- ? ponytail 12314
- ? pov 8606
- ? pov dom 3453
- ? school uniform 5776
- ? see-through 2327
- ? solo 20818
- ? sweat 11329
- ? user interface 300
Meta
- ? caption 8912
- ? text 82428
Statistics
- Id: 73679
-
Posted: 2019-01-08 03:00:31
by Zko - Size: 2931x2000
- Source: twitter.com/LewdZko/status/1082439653054185472
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 194 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
Operant conditioning (also called instrumental conditioning) is a learning process through which the strength of a behavior is modified by reinforcement or punishment. It is also a procedure that is used to bring about such learning.
Although operant and classical conditioning both involve behaviors controlled by environmental stimuli, they differ in nature. In operant conditioning, stimuli present when a behavior is rewarded or punished come to control that behavior. For example, a child may learn to open a box to get the candy inside, or learn to avoid touching a hot stove; in operant terms, the box and the stove are "discriminative stimuli". Operant behavior is said to be "voluntary": for example, the child may face a choice between opening the box and petting a puppy.
In contrast, classical conditioning involves involuntary behavior based on the pairing of stimuli with biologically significant events. For example, sight of candy may cause a child to salivate, or the sound of a door slam may signal an angry parent, causing a child to tremble. Salivation and trembling are not operants; they are not reinforced by their consequences, and they are not voluntarily "chosen".
The study of animal learning in the 20th century was dominated by the analysis of these two sorts of learning,[1] and they are still at the core of behavior analysis.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operant_conditioning
Although operant and classical conditioning both involve behaviors controlled by environmental stimuli, they differ in nature. In operant conditioning, stimuli present when a behavior is rewarded or punished come to control that behavior. For example, a child may learn to open a box to get the candy inside, or learn to avoid touching a hot stove; in operant terms, the box and the stove are "discriminative stimuli". Operant behavior is said to be "voluntary": for example, the child may face a choice between opening the box and petting a puppy.
In contrast, classical conditioning involves involuntary behavior based on the pairing of stimuli with biologically significant events. For example, sight of candy may cause a child to salivate, or the sound of a door slam may signal an angry parent, causing a child to tremble. Salivation and trembling are not operants; they are not reinforced by their consequences, and they are not voluntarily "chosen".
The study of animal learning in the 20th century was dominated by the analysis of these two sorts of learning,[1] and they are still at the core of behavior analysis.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operant_conditioning
Edit | Respond
1
>> #297912
Score: 1 (vote Up)
>> #297938
Score: 1 (vote Up)
>> #298047
Score: 2 (vote Up)
Hehe if she wasn't so blissed out of her mind Crystal could maybe learn about what's happening to her in that book there lol
Even if she wasnt tranced, this is Crystal we are talking about. You couldn't pay her to touch a book
>> #298620
Score: 0 (vote Up)