Posted on 2019-03-26 13:06:08
Score: 0 (vote Up)

So for anybody who's way into tag discussions, this might be a interesting. For example, I did not tag urination, because there is decidedly none of it going on. Although, later omorashi is implied. So, tag or no tag?

I did tag unaware, because while she is aware of *something* hypnosis related going on, she is not quite figuring it out. So was I right or wrong to use that tag?

Posted on 2019-03-26 16:47:01
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Yes. Tag. When in doubt. Tag. When it's something that could be squick to people, even if it's just indirectly mentioned (and it's honestly pretty explicit here), tag.

At least, that's my opinion.

Posted on 2019-03-26 16:55:46
Score: 0 (vote Up)

The issue with tagging it though is, that this tag is one of the more commonly blacklisted ones. In this case I would suggest not tagging it unless a mod decides you have to tag it, as it will limit the amount of ppl watching it and the people that strongly dislike urination probably aren't too offended, because it is not graphically displayed.

Posted on 2019-03-26 17:09:07
Score: 0 (vote Up)

"When deciding whether or not to tag something that only appears in text in a post (i.e. a text manip), keep this in mind: Tags for things that appear in text which are conceptual (dom/sub genders, methods of control, etc.) can be added. However, "Object" tags, which are tags that are usually included because of something being visible in the image (clothing, characters, etc.), are not to be tagged if they do not appear in the image, even if text mentions them."

This is the relevant section of the tagging guidelines. Unless a mod/admin says otherwise, i'd say don't tag it if it's not actually present in the image itself.

Posted on 2019-03-26 20:09:51
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Would you say urination is "conceptual" thing, or is it an "object" in the form of a wet stain? :-D

Posted on 2019-03-26 20:20:19
Score: 0 (vote Up)

The rule is tag what you see.

I see no pee

Posted on 2019-03-26 20:52:10
Score: 0 (vote Up)

I would not, no. Conceptual in this context refers to things that cannot be seen directly, only deduced from context, and so you HAVE to use context to tag them. Like, you won't see the words "this character is a dom" written on the image(unless someone does that to spite me :P) so dom tags have to be from context. you can see whether or not a character is urinating, so urination isn't a conceptual tag.

Similarly, if the text described a blowjob, you wouldn't tag that here either, because no blowjob is happening in the image.

Posted on 2019-03-26 21:35:19
Score: 0 (vote Up)

there both is and isn't urination, so long as it remains unobserved.

Posted on 2019-03-26 23:43:34
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Spell ICUP.