Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? dc comics 4840
- ? superman (series) 566
Character
- ? power girl 345
Artist
- ? tiechonortheal (manipper) 411
General
- ? blonde hair 33508
- ? blue eyes 17387
- ? breasts 104792
- ? cleavage 23160
- ? cleavage cutout 542
- ? denial 537
- ? female only 57772
- ? femsub 133735
- ? finger snap 714
- ? large breasts 58638
- ? leotard 5037
- ? maledom 36058
- ? muscle girl 1705
- ? open clothes 5968
- ? pendulum 11906
- ? pocket watch 1643
- ? short hair 41270
- ? super hero 6271
- ? unaware 5765
Meta
- ? manip 16684
- ? text 83802
Statistics
- Id: 77763
-
Posted: 2019-04-05 17:32:44
by tiechonortheal - Size: 1267x757
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 164 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #312881
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #312884
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #312895
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #312903
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #312924
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Sad to say that I am in possession of neither of those pieces of information.
If you have the original non-manipped version, you can try a reverse image search for it.
>> #312930
Score: 0 (vote Up)
If you have the original non-manipped version, you can try a reverse image search for it.
I don't. As I've said in the past, I'm not in the habit of prioritizing providing a bibliography for the manips I make. I'm not running a Patreon, asking people for money, or profiting from it in any way, so I don't feel bad about it. I'll tag an artist if it's obvious/I got it from their accounts/sites, but the moment it becomes a chore, I'm out. I'm fairly certain that I found this image on rule34 a week or so ago. There was no obvious artist tagged at the time.
>> #312939
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't. As I've said in the past, I'm not in the habit of prioritizing providing a bibliography for the manips I make. I'm not running a Patreon, asking people for money, or profiting from it in any way, so I don't feel bad about it. I'll tag an artist if it's obvious/I got it from their accounts/sites, but the moment it becomes a chore, I'm out. I'm fairly certain that I found this image on rule34 a week or so ago. There was no obvious artist tagged at the time.
You really don’t have to provide a “bibliography”, and it really shouldn’t be a chore. If anything, crediting the artist is the least you can do for editing their work.
>> #312942
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #312957
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Crediting the artist and citing the source is literally a bibliography. I'll do it when it's convenient for me. As I've said, I don't feel bad about any of this, as I'm not monetizing it in any way. As I think I've shown, the least that I can do is quite a bit less than your standard, and I'm fine with it.
This right here is a massive yikes.
Not to mention incredibly pretentious and insulting to the people that create the original works.
>> #312961
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Crediting the artist and citing the source is literally a bibliography. I'll do it when it's convenient for me. As I've said, I don't feel bad about any of this, as I'm not monetizing it in any way. As I think I've shown, the least that I can do is quite a bit less than your standard, and I'm fine with it.
Uh dude, I totally empathize with not wanting to hunt down image sources, but without the original artists you'd be out of a hobby. Even if you're not making money off it, the artists can't make more art as easily if you don't help people find their work. Don't be a dick.