Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? azur lane 326
Character
- ? unicorn (azur lane) 18
Artist
- ? mannaku 1
- ? rize (manipper) 30
General
- ? aware 3168
- ? blush 36679
- ? bow 2130
- ? breasts 103294
- ? cameltoe 2006
- ? dazed 12582
- ? dress 4573
- ? erect nipples 16553
- ? expressionless 20367
- ? female only 56902
- ? femdom 30069
- ? femsub 131939
- ? garter belt 794
- ? garter straps 957
- ? glowing 15750
- ? glowing eyes 16698
- ? hair buns 1414
- ? hair ribbon 1409
- ? heart 11197
- ? hypnotic clothing 403
- ? hypnotic panties 19
- ? loli 355
- ? long hair 57950
- ? mouth hold 9
- ? navel 12313
- ? panties 8359
- ? purple eyes 6675
- ? purple hair 10951
- ? ribbon 3077
- ? side ponytail 1085
- ? skirt 10764
- ? skirt lift 1989
- ? spiral eyes 23749
- ? symbol in eyes 32216
- ? thighhighs 17592
- ? thighs 2592
- ? underboob 1028
- ? underwear 11401
- ? undressing 6110
- ? very long hair 4412
- ? white panties 130
- ? yuri 6323
Meta
- ? absurdres 34460
- ? caption 8907
- ? manip 16633
- ? text 82317
Statistics
- Id: 88376
-
Posted: 2019-12-10 05:07:34
by Rize - Size: 5900x3977
- Source: www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/78057184
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 194 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #347505
Score: 1 (vote Up)
>> #347506
Score: 2 (vote Up)
Loli tag definition as provided by this site: "A female or futanari character who appears prepubescent. Generally marked by a small, child-like body, flat chest (or very small breasts), and a lack of curvature to the body."
She has curves, maybe it's just the perspective, none of the other pictures of her on the site are tagged as loli. Her legs aren't completely shown, but they aren't the legs of a child, they're very long and thick. All the text here describes her as an adult for a reason.
>> #347507
Score: 0 (vote Up)
She has curves, maybe it's just the perspective, none of the other pictures of her on the site are tagged as loli. Her legs aren't completely shown, but they aren't the legs of a child, they're very long and thick. All the text here describes her as an adult for a reason.
After a few minutes of Googling, I can't find her canon age, so I can neither confirm nor deny whether she's a child character. However, there's no denying that in this picture, she looks like a little kid.
>> #347512
Score: 0 (vote Up)
She has curves, maybe it's just the perspective, none of the other pictures of her on the site are tagged as loli. Her legs aren't completely shown, but they aren't the legs of a child, they're very long and thick. All the text here describes her as an adult for a reason.
I feel I've seen quite a few veiws like this before. Maybe we need a "maybe_loli" or "unknown age" tag. It is less about whether or not she is, but whether or not she could be considered
>> #347516
Score: 1 (vote Up)
I feel I've seen quite a few veiws like this before. Maybe we need a "maybe_loli" or "unknown age" tag. It is less about whether or not she is, but whether or not she could be considered
No.
After a few minutes of Googling, I can't find her canon age, so I can neither confirm nor deny whether she's a child character. However, there's no denying that in this picture, she looks like a little kid.
Honestly, I'm not going to approve or dispute every single post that should or should not be tagged as loli. Some posts are pretty easy to tell the difference (and are thus no issue to ask about), while others end up being in a weird grey area. If you want to add the tag to this post, go for it. But once again, we cannot go through every single post that comes up. Sometimes you're either going to have to ignore it.
>> #347565
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #347652
Score: 0 (vote Up)
She has curves, maybe it's just the perspective
Looks flat as a board to me tbh. I've seen way less clear-cut cases.
none of the other pictures of her on the site are tagged as loli.
This doesn't matter. Pictures should be taken on their own merits - and in this picture, she does NOT look of age.
Her legs aren't completely shown, but they aren't the legs of a child, they're very long and thick.
I disagree. It almost looks like baby-fat if anything.
All the text here describes her as an adult for a reason.
Text is secondary to the actual image when it comes to tagging. I like the story, you just picked a risky image to illustrate it with.
In general, I think this site could and should be more careful with regards to grey-area cases like this one, where one man's perspective-trickery or art-style choice is another man's underage content.
The rules around underage content have already tightened recently, and from what I know the laws are only getting more strict so more rule-tightening is going to happen eventually. Better safe than sorry, I say.
On that note, I am re-adding the loli tag and ask that you please stop removing it.
>> #347658
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Looks flat as a board to me tbh. I've seen way less clear-cut cases.
This doesn't matter. Pictures should be taken on their own merits - and in this picture, she does NOT look of age.
I disagree. It almost looks like baby-fat if anything.
Text is secondary to the actual image when it comes to tagging. I like the story, you just picked a risky image to illustrate it with.
In general, I think this site could and should be more careful with regards to grey-area cases like this one, where one man's perspective-trickery or art-style choice is another man's underage content.
The rules around underage content have already tightened recently, and from what I know the laws are only getting more strict so more rule-tightening is going to happen eventually. Better safe than sorry, I say.
On that note, I am re-adding the loli tag and ask that you please stop removing it.
Now flatness means no curves? I'm talking about her butt, rule of thumb, if she has wide hips, she isn't a child. And she does, pretty wide ones.
Honestly, I could have used another picture of her that clearly shows she isn't a child, but this is the only one that has that pattern in her panties that goes perfect with what I had in mind.
Can you at least leave out the tag for the first week the picture is up? New accounts have automatically blacklisted the loli tag which means most people can't see it, and that affects heavily the score, almost no loli pics reach a score higher than 100 for this reason.
It won't be any problem with the law at first glance because the picture shows no nipples nor genitals, it can safely stay untagged for a week and then put back once everyone that would have seen it already scored it.
>> #347728
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Can you at least leave out the tag for the first week the picture is up? New accounts have automatically blacklisted the loli tag which means most people can't see it, and that affects heavily the score, almost no loli pics reach a score higher than 100 for this reason.
It won't be any problem with the law at first glance because the picture shows no nipples nor genitals, it can safely stay untagged for a week and then put back once everyone that would have seen it already scored it.
I feel like your priorities may need reevaluating.
>> #347755
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Now flatness means no curves? I'm talking about her butt, rule of thumb, if she has wide hips, she isn't a child. And she does, pretty wide ones.
The perspective makes it look weird, but those definitely aren't adult hips to me.
Can you at least leave out the tag for the first week the picture is up? New accounts have automatically blacklisted the loli tag which means most people can't see it, and that affects heavily the score, almost no loli pics reach a score higher than 100 for this reason.
It won't be any problem with the law at first glance because the picture shows no nipples nor genitals, it can safely stay untagged for a week and then put back once everyone that would have seen it already scored it.
That is not how things work. For one, the scoring system is entirely meaningless and frankly the site would be better off without it (but because we don't have anyone willing to butcher the software the Hub uses we can't get rid of it).
Also, it's trivially easy to opt into blacklisted content just by clicking the blacklist item in the sidebar. It's more of a "Caution: This image contains this content" than anything.
For another, if anything an auto-blacklisted tag means it should be *immediately* added if relevant, since it's an indication that either it's a highly acquired-taste tag (see: Nightmare Fuel, Death) or there are possible issues legally or hosting-wise.
Also fun fact, legally in some places you're not allowed to show underage people on a porn site at all, regardless of how exposed they are or whether they're even relevant to the subject matter.